[2014] FWCA 3994 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Fonterra Australia Pty Limited
(AG2014/1304)
FONTERRA (ENERGY SERVICES - DENNINGTON) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER RYAN | MELBOURNE, 16 JUNE 2014 |
Application for approval of the Fonterra (Energy Services - Dennington) Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Fonterra (Energy Services - Dennington) Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) and was made by Fonterra Australia Pty Limited. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] An undertaking has been given in relation to the consultation term of the Agreement and this undertaking has become a term of the Agreement in accordance with s.191(1) of the Act and is appended at Appendix A.
[3] Subject to this undertaking, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the CFMEU.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54(1), will operate from 23 June 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 September 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE408629 PR552096>
APPENDIX A
- AGLC
- Fonterra Australia Pty Limited [2014] FWCA 3994
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 3994
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue was whether the agreement covered a "appropriate group of employees" as defined in the Fair Work Act, and if it was genuinely negotiated between the employer and the employees. Additionally, the court needed to determine if the agreement contained the necessary minimum terms and conditions, and if it complied with the procedural requirements for certification. The applicant argued that the agreement was fairly negotiated and met all the necessary criteria for approval.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the agreement did indeed cover an appropriate group of employees and was genuinely negotiated between the parties. The Commission also determined that the agreement contained the necessary minimum terms and conditions and was compliant with the procedural requirements for certification. Consequently, the Commission approved the Fonterra (Energy Services - Dennington) Enterprise Agreement 2013, making it a legally binding agreement between Fonterra Australia Pty Limited and the employees covered by the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.