Flynn and Troy (Costs)

In the matter of Flynn and Troy (Costs), Justice Murphy of the Supreme Court of Tasmania was required to determine the question of costs arising from an application filed on 12 March 2009, which included an oral application for re-opening.

The central legal issue before the Court was how to allocate the costs associated with the aforementioned application and the subsequent re-opening request.

Justice Murphy ordered that the question of the costs of and incidental to the application filed on 12 March 2009, including the oral application for re-opening, be reserved for determination by the trial judge. Furthermore, the parties were granted liberty to use the written submissions previously filed by each of them at any adjourned hearing.