| [2024] FWCA 3602 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Flyash Australia Pty Limited T/A Flyash Australia
(AG2024/3343)
FLYASH AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2023
| Cement and concrete products | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT MILLHOUSE | MELBOURNE, 16 OCTOBER 2024 |
Application for approval of the Flyash Australia Pty Limited Enterprise Agreement 2023
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Flyash Australia Pty Limited Enterprise Agreement 2023 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). It has been made by Flyash Australia Pty Limited T/A Flyash Australia (Employer). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached at Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each requirement of ss 186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. For the purposes of the better off overall test, I have had regard to each of the matters in s 193A(2)-(7).
Pursuant to s 205A(2) of the Act, the workplace delegates’ rights term prescribed by the Cement, Lime and Quarrying Award 2020 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
I observe that the following clauses are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES). However, noting clause 5 of the Agreement, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES in the Act will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES:
· Compassionate leave – stillbirth consideration: The entitlement to compassionate leave provided by Clause 13.3.3 of the Agreement does not appear to be triggered after the stillbirth of a child of the employee or a member of the employee’s immediate family or household as per s 105(1)(b) of the Act or after the employee or the employee’s spouse or de facto partner has a miscarriage as per s 105(1)(c) of the Act.
· Notice of termination – failure to provide notice: Clause 14.3 of the Agreement provides that if an employee fails to give notice, the Company may withhold from any monies due to the Employee on termination under this Agreement or the NES, an amount not exceeding the amount the Employee would have been paid under this Agreement in respect of the period of notice required to by the clause less any period of notice actually given by the Employee. This appears to restrict an employees’ NES entitlements upon termination.
The Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s 201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s 54 of the Act will operate from 23 October 2024. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 September 2026.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE526398 PR780280>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Flyash Australia Pty Limited T/A Flyash Australia [2024] FWCA 3602
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 3602
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the application for approval was made in accordance with the relevant statutory provisions and whether the terms of the agreement met the requirements for being considered fair and reasonable. This involved examining the process by which the agreement was made, including whether the requisite employee and employer consultation took place, and whether the agreement provided for appropriate protections and entitlements for the employees.
The court found that Flyash Australia had followed the necessary procedural requirements in seeking approval of the enterprise agreement. The evidence demonstrated that adequate consultation had occurred between the parties, and the agreement was made in good faith. The court also assessed the substantive terms of the agreement and determined that they provided fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees, taking into account the specific circumstances of the company and its workforce. The agreement included provisions for wages, hours of work, leave, and other employment conditions that were considered to be fair and balanced.
Consequently, the court approved the Flyash Australia Pty Limited Enterprise Agreement 2023, finding it to be a lawful and appropriate enterprise agreement. The approval ensured that the terms and conditions of employment were governed by the agreement, providing a framework for the ongoing relationship between Flyash Australia and its employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.