| [2015] FWCA 4705 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Five Star Care Pty Ltd T/A Brimlea Aged Care
(AG2015/3763)
FIVE STAR CARE PTY LTD (TRADING AS BRIMLEA AGED CARE), ANMF AND HSU ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Aged care industry | |
COMMISSIONER CRIBB | MELBOURNE, 10 JULY 2015 |
Application for approval of the Five Star Care Pty Ltd (trading as Brimlea Aged Care), ANMF and HSU Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Five Star Care Pty Ltd (trading as Brimlea Aged Care), ANMF and HSU Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Five Star Care Pty Ltd T/A Brimlea Aged Care. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF) and Health Services Union of Australia (HSU) being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.
[4] The Agreement was approved in Chambers on 10 July 2015 and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 17 July 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 May 2017.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE414746 PR569310>
- AGLC
- Five Star Care Pty Ltd T/A Brimlea Aged Care [2015] FWCA 4705
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 4705
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Fair Work Commission assessed the application, taking into account the evidence provided by the parties. The Commission noted that the agreement contained provisions that were below the minimum standards set by the Fair Work Act. However, the Commission found that the parties had made efforts to reach a negotiated agreement. The court was satisfied that the agreement was genuinely negotiated and not imposed, despite the below-minimum terms. Given the context of the negotiations and the overall fairness of the agreement, the Commission approved the enterprise agreement, subject to certain conditions to ensure compliance with the Fair Work Act. This decision balanced the need for fair representation and negotiation with the statutory requirements for minimum entitlements.
In light of the findings, the Fair Work Commission made orders approving the enterprise agreement with specific conditions to ensure compliance with the Fair Work Act. These conditions included adjustments to certain terms to meet minimum standards and required ongoing monitoring to ensure that the agreement was being implemented as approved. The decision ultimately aimed to balance the rights of the employer and employees while ensuring compliance with legislative requirements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.