FISK & BRASS
Case
•
[2013] FCCA 1602
•14 October 2013
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
FISK & BRASS [2013] FCCA 1602
[2013] FCCA 1602
14 October 2013
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of FISK & BRASS, Judge Coker made orders concerning the parental responsibility and time arrangements for two children, X and Y. The dispute centred on how the parents would share responsibility for the children's upbringing and the specific arrangements for the children's living arrangements and time spent with each parent.
The court was required to determine the extent of equal shared parental responsibility for major long-term issues, how parents should consult on such decisions, and the specific arrangements for the children's daily care, welfare, and development. Further, the court needed to establish detailed time arrangements for the children with each parent, considering whether the parents lived in the same locality or not, including provisions for school holidays, special occasions, and communication. The court also had to address the process for future dispute resolution and the discharge of previous orders and parenting plans.
Judge Coker ordered the discharge of all previous orders and parenting plans. The parents were granted equal shared parental responsibility for major long-term issues, with specific requirements for consultation and genuine effort to reach joint decisions. The orders detailed how each parent would be responsible for the children's daily care when the children were with them. Significant detail was provided regarding the children's living arrangements and time spent with each parent, differentiating between scenarios where parents lived in the same or different localities, and outlining specific schedules for school terms, gazetted school holidays, and special occasions. The court also mandated communication protocols, including telephone and Skype contact, and established a framework for future mediation and dispute resolution, requiring parties to attempt mediation before applying to court for variations.
The court was required to determine the extent of equal shared parental responsibility for major long-term issues, how parents should consult on such decisions, and the specific arrangements for the children's daily care, welfare, and development. Further, the court needed to establish detailed time arrangements for the children with each parent, considering whether the parents lived in the same locality or not, including provisions for school holidays, special occasions, and communication. The court also had to address the process for future dispute resolution and the discharge of previous orders and parenting plans.
Judge Coker ordered the discharge of all previous orders and parenting plans. The parents were granted equal shared parental responsibility for major long-term issues, with specific requirements for consultation and genuine effort to reach joint decisions. The orders detailed how each parent would be responsible for the children's daily care when the children were with them. Significant detail was provided regarding the children's living arrangements and time spent with each parent, differentiating between scenarios where parents lived in the same or different localities, and outlining specific schedules for school terms, gazetted school holidays, and special occasions. The court also mandated communication protocols, including telephone and Skype contact, and established a framework for future mediation and dispute resolution, requiring parties to attempt mediation before applying to court for variations.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
FISK & BRASS [2013] FCCA 1602
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
2
Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation
[1997] HCA 25
Taylor & Barker
[2007] FamCA 1246
Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation
[1997] HCA 25