| [2025] FWCA 3158 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Federation Of Victorian Traditional Owner Corporations Ltd
(AG2025/3032)
FEDERATION OF VICTORIAN TRADITIONAL OWNER CORPORATIONS LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024–2027
| Industries not otherwise assigned | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT FAROUQUE | MELBOURNE, 19 SEPTEMBER 2025 |
Application for approval of the Federation of Victorian Traditional Owner Corporations Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2024–2027
Introduction
The Federation of Victorian Traditional Owner Corporations Ltd (the Employer) has made an application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the Federation of Victorian Traditional Owner Corporations Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2024–2027 (the Agreement), pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act).
Section 186, 187 and 188
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
Section 183 Bargaining Representatives
The Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, have given notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s 201(2), I note the Agreement covers the Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU).
Approval
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s 54 of the Act, will operate seven days after approval.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE530498 PR791890>
- AGLC
- Federation Of Victorian Traditional Owner Corporations Ltd [2025] FWCA 3158
- Case
- [2025] FWCA 3158
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement complied with the formal requirements of the Act, and whether it provided for appropriate mechanisms to ensure the agreement was fair and equitable. Specifically, the Commission needed to consider whether the agreement contained all the mandated terms and conditions, whether the agreement was made in good faith, and if it provided for appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms. The Commission also had to examine whether the agreement contained any terms that might be considered contrary to public policy.
In delivering its decision, the Commission examined the proposed agreement against the statutory criteria set out in the Fair Work Act. The Commission found that the agreement met all the formal requirements and contained the necessary terms and conditions. It was also satisfied that the agreement was made in good faith and included appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms. The Commission noted that the agreement included provisions that were beneficial to the employees, such as provisions for flexible working arrangements and provisions aimed at supporting the cultural heritage of the traditional owner corporations. The Commission concluded that the agreement was fair and appropriate, and approved the agreement in accordance with section 176 of the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.