Farlow and Farlow
Case
•
[2009] FamCA 46
•4 February 2009
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Farlow and Farlow [2009] FamCA 46
[2009] FamCA 46
4 February 2009
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Farlow and Farlow*, heard before Mushin J, the husband filed an application on 20 September 2007 concerning matters within the Family Court of Australia. The wife sought costs in relation to this application.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the husband's application should be dismissed and, consequently, whether the husband should be ordered to pay the wife's costs associated with that application.
Mushin J dismissed the husband's application. The court further ordered that, in the absence of agreement between the parties within 28 days, the husband was to pay the wife's costs of and incidental to the dismissed application, to be assessed in accordance with Chapter 19 of the *Family Law Rules 2004*.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the husband's application should be dismissed and, consequently, whether the husband should be ordered to pay the wife's costs associated with that application.
Mushin J dismissed the husband's application. The court further ordered that, in the absence of agreement between the parties within 28 days, the husband was to pay the wife's costs of and incidental to the dismissed application, to be assessed in accordance with Chapter 19 of the *Family Law Rules 2004*.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Farlow and Farlow [2009] FamCA 46
Most Recent Citation
Dragon Property Development & Investment Pty Ltd v 183 Eastwood Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 1000
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
1