Farina and Naima (No 2)
Case
•
[2017] FamCA 540
•28 July 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Farina and Naima (No 2) [2017] FamCA 540
[2017] FamCA 540
28 July 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Farina and Naima (No 2)*, Hogan J of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia considered an application for property settlement orders made by Mr Naima. Ms Farina was the respondent to this application.
The central legal issue before the court was whether Mr Naima's application for property settlement orders should be granted.
Hogan J dismissed Mr Naima's application for property settlement orders. The court also made provision for the parties to make submissions regarding costs, should Ms Farina elect to pursue an application for costs. The process for these submissions was detailed, with specific timeframes for each party to file and serve their respective written arguments.
The central legal issue before the court was whether Mr Naima's application for property settlement orders should be granted.
Hogan J dismissed Mr Naima's application for property settlement orders. The court also made provision for the parties to make submissions regarding costs, should Ms Farina elect to pursue an application for costs. The process for these submissions was detailed, with specific timeframes for each party to file and serve their respective written arguments.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Farina and Naima (No 2) [2017] FamCA 540
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
1
Norbis v Norbis
[1986] HCA 17
Singer v Berghouse
[1994] HCA 40
Stanford v Stanford
[2012] HCA 52