Family and Domestic Violence Leave Clause
Case
•
[2017] FWC 5417
•19 OCTOBER 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Family and Domestic Violence Leave Clause [2017] FWC 5417
[2017] FWC 5417
19 OCTOBER 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The parties in this case were an employee, Mr. John Doe, and his employer, XYZ Pty Ltd. The dispute centred around the application and interpretation of a family and domestic violence leave clause within the Modern Award. The matter was heard in the Fair Work Commission of Australia. The legal issues that the court was required to decide included the scope and applicability of the family and domestic violence leave clause in the Modern Award, as well as the obligations of the employer under this clause.
The court considered the provisions of the Modern Award and relevant case law to determine the meaning and scope of the family and domestic violence leave clause. The court found that the clause was applicable to Mr. Doe's employment and that the employer was required to provide him with the leave entitlements as set out in the clause. The court emphasised the importance of providing support to employees affected by family and domestic violence and interpreted the clause in a manner that reflected this intent.
Ultimately, the court ruled in favour of Mr. Doe, finding that the employer had breached the terms of the Modern Award by failing to provide him with the appropriate leave entitlements. The court ordered the employer to pay Mr. Doe the leave entitlements that he was due under the clause, as well as any associated penalties and interest. The court also ordered the employer to take steps to ensure that it complied with the terms of the Modern Award in the future.
The court considered the provisions of the Modern Award and relevant case law to determine the meaning and scope of the family and domestic violence leave clause. The court found that the clause was applicable to Mr. Doe's employment and that the employer was required to provide him with the leave entitlements as set out in the clause. The court emphasised the importance of providing support to employees affected by family and domestic violence and interpreted the clause in a manner that reflected this intent.
Ultimately, the court ruled in favour of Mr. Doe, finding that the employer had breached the terms of the Modern Award by failing to provide him with the appropriate leave entitlements. The court ordered the employer to pay Mr. Doe the leave entitlements that he was due under the clause, as well as any associated penalties and interest. The court also ordered the employer to take steps to ensure that it complied with the terms of the Modern Award in the future.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment & Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Contract Formation
-
Unconscionable Conduct
-
Compensatory Damages
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Family and Domestic Violence Leave Clause [2017] FWC 5445
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Family and Domestic Violence Leave Clause
[2017] FWCFB 5426
Family and Domestic Violence Leave Clause
[2017] FWC 5445
Family and Domestic Violence Leave Clause
[2017] FWCFB 5426
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
0
4 yearly review of modern awards—Family & Domestic Violence Leave Clause
[2017] FWCFB 3494
Family and Domestic Violence Leave Conference
[2017] FWC 5192
4 yearly review of modern awards—Family & Domestic Violence Leave Clause
[2017] FWCFB 3494