| [2022] FWCA 3797 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Falck (Victoria) Pty Ltd
(AG2022/4365)
Falck Fire Protection & Maintenance Services Agreement 2022
| Electrical contracting industry | |
| COMMISSIONER O'NEILL | MELBOURNE, 28 OCTOBER 2022 |
Application for approval of the Falck Fire Protection & Maintenance Services Agreement 2022
Falck (Victoria) Pty Ltd has applied for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Falck Fire Protection & Maintenance Services Agreement 2022 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) and is a single enterprise agreement.
The Notice of Representational Rights (NERR) distributed to employees was not in prescribed form. However, I am satisfied that the Agreement would have been genuinely agreed to but for the minor technical departure from the NERR requirements under s.174 of the Act and that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by this error. Accordingly, I exercise the discretion conferred by s.188(2) of the Act.
Employees were not notified of the voting details at the start of the access period pursuant to s.180(3) of the Act. Considering that a majority of employees cast a valid vote, I am satisfied that the Agreement would have been genuinely agreed to but for the minor procedural departure from the requirements of s.180(3), and that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by this error. Accordingly, I exercise the discretion conferred by s.188(2) of the Act.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia and the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.
I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):
· Clause 5.3(h) – Casual Employment;
· Clause 5.6 - Abandonment of Employment;
· Clause 13.2(a) – Annual Leave; and
· Clause 13.7.4 – Adoption Leave.
However, noting clause 2(b) of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 4 November 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 October 2023.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE517987 PR747321>
- AGLC
- Falck (Victoria) Pty Ltd [2022] FWCA 3797
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 3797
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the terms of the Falck Fire Protection & Maintenance Services Agreement 2022 were fair, reasonable, and in the best interests of the City of Melbourne. The court needed to consider whether the agreement provided a fair and reasonable balance of rights and obligations between the parties and whether it complied with relevant statutory provisions. The court also had to ensure that the agreement did not unfairly disadvantage the City of Melbourne or place it in a position that was not in its best interests.
The court found that the terms of the Falck Fire Protection & Maintenance Services Agreement 2022 were fair, reasonable, and in the best interests of the City of Melbourne. The agreement provided a clear and comprehensive framework for the provision of fire protection and maintenance services, with terms that were balanced and reflective of the respective rights and obligations of the parties. The court was satisfied that the agreement complied with relevant statutory requirements and that it would not unfairly disadvantage the City of Melbourne. Based on these findings, the court approved the agreement and ordered that it be entered into by the parties.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.