FAIRCHILD & MEDINA (No.2)
Case
•
[2017] FCCA 1613
•13 June 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
FAIRCHILD & MEDINA (No.2) [2017] FCCA 1613
[2017] FCCA 1613
13 June 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Fairchild & Medina (No.2)*, Judge Henderson of the Family Court of Australia considered an application by the father concerning parenting orders. The specific nature of the dispute, beyond the father's application, is not detailed in the provided text.
The central legal issue before the court was the determination of the father's application dated 24 February 2017. The court was required to decide whether this application should be granted or dismissed.
Judge Henderson dismissed the father's application. Following this determination, the court ordered the mother to file and serve written submissions regarding costs within 21 days, with the father to respond within a further 21 days thereafter.
The central legal issue before the court was the determination of the father's application dated 24 February 2017. The court was required to decide whether this application should be granted or dismissed.
Judge Henderson dismissed the father's application. Following this determination, the court ordered the mother to file and serve written submissions regarding costs within 21 days, with the father to respond within a further 21 days thereafter.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
2
Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy
[2000] HCA 63
Hartnett & Sampson
[2008] FamCA 75
R v Watson; Ex parte Armstrong
[1976] HCA 39