Fair Work Ombudsman v Jenni International Pty Ltd and Anor (No.2)
Case
•
[2020] FCCA 2924
•30 October 2020
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Fair Work Ombudsman v Jenni International Pty Ltd and Anor (No.2) [2020] FCCA 2924
[2020] FCCA 2924
30 October 2020
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Fair Work Ombudsman v Jenni International Pty Ltd and Anor (No.2)*, Judge McNab of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia considered the assessment of penalties for contraventions of the *Fair Work Act 2009* (Cth). The dispute involved the underpayment of entitlements by a small business, Jenni International Pty Ltd, to its non-Australian citizen employees.
The court was required to determine the appropriate pecuniary penalties to be imposed on both the corporate respondent, Jenni International Pty Ltd, and the individual respondent, the second respondent. In doing so, the court considered a non-exhaustive list of factors relevant to the imposition of penalties under the Act.
Judge McNab reasoned that the underpayment of entitlements was significant and that the respondents had not exhibited contrition or provided evidence of corrective action. The court placed significant weight on the need for both general and specific deterrence, noting that the respondents' conduct was deliberate. The court further observed that the second respondent, an individual, was highly educated, which was a relevant consideration in assessing their culpability. Consequently, the court ordered Jenni International Pty Ltd to pay a total pecuniary penalty of $90,000 and the second respondent to pay a total pecuniary penalty of $31,000, with both amounts to be paid to the Consolidated Revenue Fund of the Commonwealth.
The court was required to determine the appropriate pecuniary penalties to be imposed on both the corporate respondent, Jenni International Pty Ltd, and the individual respondent, the second respondent. In doing so, the court considered a non-exhaustive list of factors relevant to the imposition of penalties under the Act.
Judge McNab reasoned that the underpayment of entitlements was significant and that the respondents had not exhibited contrition or provided evidence of corrective action. The court placed significant weight on the need for both general and specific deterrence, noting that the respondents' conduct was deliberate. The court further observed that the second respondent, an individual, was highly educated, which was a relevant consideration in assessing their culpability. Consequently, the court ordered Jenni International Pty Ltd to pay a total pecuniary penalty of $90,000 and the second respondent to pay a total pecuniary penalty of $31,000, with both amounts to be paid to the Consolidated Revenue Fund of the Commonwealth.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Penalty
-
Remedies
-
Intention
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Fair Work Ombudsman v Jenny Global Pty Ltd [2022] FedCFamC2G 472
Cases Citing This Decision
2
Fair Work Ombudsman v Jenni International Pty Ltd
[2023] FedCFamC2G 1138
Fair Work Ombudsman v Jenny Global Pty Ltd
[2022] FedCFamC2G 472
Cases Cited
15
Statutory Material Cited
3
Fair Work Ombudsman v Jenni International Pty Ltd
[2019] FCCA 2971
Mason v Harrington Corporation Pty Ltd
[2007] FMCA 7
Kelly v Fitzpatrick
[2007] FCA 1080