Fair Work Ombudsman v Jaycee Trading Pty Ltd & Anor (No.2)
Case
•
[2013] FCCA 2128
•12 December 2013
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Fair Work Ombudsman v Jaycee Trading Pty Ltd & Anor (No.2) [2013] FCCA 2128
[2013] FCCA 2128
12 December 2013
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Federal Court of Australia, constituted by Emmett J, considered a dispute between the Fair Work Ombudsman and Jaycee Trading Pty Ltd, along with its director, Mr. John Charles Davies. The proceedings concerned alleged contraventions of the *Fair Work Act 2009* (Cth) by Jaycee Trading, with Mr. Davies alleged to be knowingly concerned in these contraventions.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether Jaycee Trading had contravened section 50 of the *Fair Work Act 2009* (Cth) by failing to pay minimum wages to two employees, and whether Mr. Davies was knowingly concerned in these contraventions, thereby contravening section 550 of the Act. The Court was also required to determine the appropriate penalty for these contraventions.
Emmett J found that Jaycee Trading had indeed contravened section 50 of the Act by failing to pay the minimum hourly rate and overtime rates to the two employees. His Honour also found that Mr. Davies was knowingly concerned in these contraventions, having been aware of the employees' entitlements and the company's failure to meet them. In determining penalties, the Court considered the seriousness of the contraventions, the need for deterrence, and the financial capacity of the respondents. Jaycee Trading was ordered to pay a penalty of $10,200 and Mr. Davies was ordered to pay a penalty of $2,040.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether Jaycee Trading had contravened section 50 of the *Fair Work Act 2009* (Cth) by failing to pay minimum wages to two employees, and whether Mr. Davies was knowingly concerned in these contraventions, thereby contravening section 550 of the Act. The Court was also required to determine the appropriate penalty for these contraventions.
Emmett J found that Jaycee Trading had indeed contravened section 50 of the Act by failing to pay the minimum hourly rate and overtime rates to the two employees. His Honour also found that Mr. Davies was knowingly concerned in these contraventions, having been aware of the employees' entitlements and the company's failure to meet them. In determining penalties, the Court considered the seriousness of the contraventions, the need for deterrence, and the financial capacity of the respondents. Jaycee Trading was ordered to pay a penalty of $10,200 and Mr. Davies was ordered to pay a penalty of $2,040.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Remedies
-
Jurisdiction
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Fair Work Ombudsman v Donence [2023] FedCFamC2G 32
Cases Citing This Decision
9
Fair Work Ombudsman v Kleen Group Pty Ltd & Anor
[2016] FCCA 278
Fair Work Ombudsman v Viper Industries Pty Ltd
[2015] FCCA 492
Fair Work Ombudsman v Sona Peaks Pty Ltd & Anor
[2015] FCCA 137
Cases Cited
14
Statutory Material Cited
0
Fair Work Ombudsman v Jaycee Trading Pty Ltd & Anor (No.1)
[2013] FCCA 1926
McIver v Healey
[2008] FCA 425
McIver v Healey
[2008] FCA 425