Fair Work Ombudsman v A and K Property Services Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2019] FCCA 2259
•16 August 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Fair Work Ombudsman v A and K Property Services Pty Ltd [2019] FCCA 2259
[2019] FCCA 2259
16 August 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) brought proceedings against A and K Property Services Pty Ltd (the Company) in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia. The dispute concerned alleged contraventions of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) by the Company, specifically in relation to the underpayment of wages to an employee. The FWO sought pecuniary penalties and orders for the recovery of the underpaid wages.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the Company had contravened section 45 of the Fair Work Act by failing to pay an employee, Mr. S. Singh, the minimum hourly rate and overtime entitlements as prescribed by the relevant modern award, the Cleaning Services Award 2010. The Court was also required to determine the appropriate penalty to be imposed for any proven contraventions and to order the repayment of any outstanding wages.
Judge Jarrett found that the Company had indeed contravened the Fair Work Act by failing to pay Mr. Singh his minimum entitlements under the Cleaning Services Award 2010. The Court reasoned that the Company's record-keeping obligations under section 557 of the Act were also breached, as the records produced did not accurately reflect the hours worked or the payments made to Mr. Singh. In determining the penalty, the Court considered factors such as the seriousness of the contraventions, the Company's size and financial capacity, and the need for deterrence. The Court applied the principles of statutory interpretation to the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act and the Cleaning Services Award 2010.
The Court ordered A and K Property Services Pty Ltd to pay pecuniary penalties totalling $10,800 and to rectify the underpayments to Mr. Singh, which amounted to $10,000. The Company was also ordered to pay the FWO's legal costs.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the Company had contravened section 45 of the Fair Work Act by failing to pay an employee, Mr. S. Singh, the minimum hourly rate and overtime entitlements as prescribed by the relevant modern award, the Cleaning Services Award 2010. The Court was also required to determine the appropriate penalty to be imposed for any proven contraventions and to order the repayment of any outstanding wages.
Judge Jarrett found that the Company had indeed contravened the Fair Work Act by failing to pay Mr. Singh his minimum entitlements under the Cleaning Services Award 2010. The Court reasoned that the Company's record-keeping obligations under section 557 of the Act were also breached, as the records produced did not accurately reflect the hours worked or the payments made to Mr. Singh. In determining the penalty, the Court considered factors such as the seriousness of the contraventions, the Company's size and financial capacity, and the need for deterrence. The Court applied the principles of statutory interpretation to the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act and the Cleaning Services Award 2010.
The Court ordered A and K Property Services Pty Ltd to pay pecuniary penalties totalling $10,800 and to rectify the underpayments to Mr. Singh, which amounted to $10,000. The Company was also ordered to pay the FWO's legal costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment Law
Legal Concepts
-
Penalty
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
1
Statutory Material Cited
4
Fair Work Ombudsman v Hasegawa & Ye International Pty Ltd
[2019] FCCA 1424