FAIR WORK COMMISSION - Modern Awards Review - Road Transport (Long Distance Operations) Award 2010

Case [2013] FWC 3910


[2013] FWC 3910

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

STATEMENT AND DIRECTIONS

Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009
Sch. 5, Item 6 - Review of all modern awards (other than modern enterprise and State PS awards) after first 2 years

Chamber of Commerce & Industry of Western Australia
(AM2012/258)

COMMISSIONER LEE

MELBOURNE, 20 JUNE 2013

Review of all modern awards (other than modern enterprise and State PS awards) after first 2 years - Funeral Industry Award 2010

[1] Schedule 5, item 6 of the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 requires the Fair Work Commission to conduct a review of all modern awards (other than modern enterprise awards and state reference public sector modern awards) as soon as practicable after 1 January 2012.

[2] As part of the review, The Chamber of Commerce & Industry of Western Australia has made an application for review of the Funeral Industry Award 2010. The application made sought to remove clause 10.5 of the Funeral Industry Award 2010 and replace it with an alternate clause as follows;

    10.5 Casual employee

    (a) A casual employee is an employee engaged by the hour and paid as such.

    (b) A casual employee will be paid an hourly rate of 1/38th of the weekly rate prescribed for the class of work performed, plus a loading of 25%.

    (c) On each occasion a casual employee is required to attend work the employee must be paid for a minimum of four hours’ work.”

[3] The matter was listed for conference before me on Tuesday 28 May 2013.

[4] At the conference, the Australian Workers’ Union indicated that they were prepared to discuss with the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Western Australia an amended version of the variation sought.

[5] After some discussions in conference about the possible terms of an amendment to the variation, it was agreed that the Australian Workers’ Union and the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Western Australia would have further discussions aimed at reaching agreement as to the form of the variation to clause 10.5.

[6] On Friday 14 June 2013, I received the following email from Ms Healey of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Western Australia;

    “Dear Commissioner

    I refer to the abovementioned matter and recent correspondence from the AWU dated 30 May 2013.

    I confirm discussions have been held with the AWU and wish to advise it appears we have reached a consent position on the wording of the casual clause. We have also consulted with the other interested parties present at the conference held 28 May 2013 and understand they do not oppose the proposed wording of the clause detailed below.

    Accordingly, subject to the views of the Commission, we seek to vary the Funeral Industry Award 2010 by deleting clause 10.5 and replacing it with:

      10.5 Casual employee

      (a) A casual employee is an employee engaged by the hour and paid as such.

      (b) A casual employee will be paid an hourly rate of 1/38th of the weekly rate prescribed for the class of work performed, plus a loading of 25%.

      (c) On each occasion a casual employee is required to attend work the employee must be paid for a minimum of four hours’ work, including when engaged more than once in any day. This minimum payment is made whether the casual employee is required to work the full four hours or not.

    Should you have any queries in relation to this matter, please contact me...”

[7] On 18 June 2013, I received correspondence from the Australian Workers’ Union which confirmed that the Australian Workers’ Union has “been in discussions with the applicant in relation to this matter and that [the Australian Workers’ Union] do not oppose the variation in the terms sought [in Ms Healey’s] correspondence”.

[8] The Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 at Schedule 5, item 6(2) sets out the approach the Fair Work Commission must take in the review;

    6 Review of all modern awards (other than modern enterprise awards and State reference public sector modern awards) after first 2 years

    (2) In the review, FWA must consider whether the modern awards:

      (a) achieve the modern awards objective; and

      (b) are operating effectively, without anomalies or technical problems arising from the Part 10A award modernisation process.”

[9] Having considered the proposed amended variation above I have formed the preliminary view that it would be appropriate to approve the amended variation sought by the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Western Australia.

[10] If there is an objection by any party to the proposed amended variation being made, parties must advise my chambers of such by close of business Thursday 4 July 2013.

[11] Any objections should be accompanied by a written submission as to the basis of the objection to the variation.

[12] In the absence of any objection being received by that date, the variation will be approved.

[13] Queries in relation to this Statement are to be directed to my chambers, by email: chambers.lee.c@fwc.gov.au or by telephone (03) 8661 7725.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR537968>

Details
AGLC
FAIR WORK COMMISSION - Modern Awards Review - Road Transport (Long Distance Operations) Award 2010 [2013] FWC 3910
Case
[2013] FWC 3910
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission considered a review of the Road Transport (Long Distance Operations) Award 2010, which was subject to mandatory review after two years as per the Fair Work Act 2009. The dispute arose from submissions by various stakeholders, including industry representatives, employee advocates, and other interested parties, regarding the continued appropriateness and fairness of the award's provisions in light of contemporary industry conditions and broader economic factors.

The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the existing award's provisions remained appropriate and fair, given the evolving landscape of the road transport industry. This involved assessing the award's impact on both employers and employees, including considerations of wage rates, working conditions, and the overall competitiveness of the industry. The Commission also needed to determine if any changes were necessary to ensure the award continued to promote fairness and efficiency in the workplace.

After examining the submissions and evidence presented, the Fair Work Commission determined that several provisions of the Road Transport (Long Distance Operations) Award 2010 required amendment to maintain fairness and relevance. The Commission highlighted that while the industry had undergone changes, the award needed to reflect these developments to support sustainable business practices and fair treatment for employees. The Commission made specific changes to wage rates, allowances, and other conditions, aiming to balance the needs of employers and employees. The Commission also noted the importance of maintaining a fair and competitive industry while ensuring employee protections and standards were upheld.

The final orders of the Commission included amendments to various clauses of the Road Transport (Long Distance Operations) Award 2010, reflecting the adjustments deemed necessary based on the review. These changes were intended to ensure the award remained fair and appropriate, supporting both the industry's competitiveness and the wellbeing of its workers. The Commission's decision aimed to strike a balance between the interests of employers and employees, taking into account the current economic and industry conditions.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.