FAH19 v Minister for Immigration

The applicant, FAH19, sought judicial review of a decision made by the Immigration Assessment Authority (IAA) concerning their application for a Safe Haven Enterprise visa. The Minister for Immigration was the first respondent. The dispute centred on whether the IAA had correctly applied section 473DD of the *Migration Act 1958* (Cth) in its assessment of the applicant's case. The matter came before Judge Street of the Federal Circuit Court.

The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the IAA had committed a jurisdictional error in its decision-making process. Specifically, the Court was required to determine if the IAA had failed to correctly apply the provisions of section 473DD of the *Migration Act 1958* (Cth) when assessing FAH19's visa application.

Judge Street found that no jurisdictional error had been made out. The Court's reasoning, though not detailed in the provided text, led to the conclusion that the IAA's application of section 473DD was lawful. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application.

The application was dismissed, and the applicant was ordered to pay the first respondent's costs, fixed at $7,467.00.