Fagin v Australian Leisure and Hospitality Group P/L
Case
•
[2018] NSWCA 37
•26 February 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Fagin v Australian Leisure and Hospitality Group P/L [2018] NSWCA 37
[2018] NSWCA 37
26 February 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicant, Fagin, sought the appointment of pro bono counsel in proceedings against the respondent, Australian Leisure and Hospitality Group Pty Ltd. The application was heard by Payne JA.
The sole legal issue before the Court was whether to grant Fagin's application for the appointment of pro bono counsel. There was no broader issue of principle raised by the application itself.
Payne JA granted the application, referring the matter to the Registrar for the appointment of pro bono counsel. The decision indicates that the Court was satisfied that the criteria for such an appointment were met in this instance.
The sole legal issue before the Court was whether to grant Fagin's application for the appointment of pro bono counsel. There was no broader issue of principle raised by the application itself.
Payne JA granted the application, referring the matter to the Registrar for the appointment of pro bono counsel. The decision indicates that the Court was satisfied that the criteria for such an appointment were met in this instance.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Standing
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
1
Bar-Mordecai v Rotman
[2000] NSWCA 123
Fagin v Australian Leisure and Hospitality Group Pty Limited
[2017] NSWCA 306