FABIANA & BECCA

In the matter of *Fabiana & Becca*, heard by McClelland DCJ, the applicant asserted that she and the respondent were in a de facto relationship. The applicant sought various interim orders, including periodic and lump sum spousal maintenance, an indemnity from the respondent against their joint and several debts, and a litigation funding order.

The primary legal issues before the court were whether the applicant had established a de facto relationship, and consequently, whether she was entitled to the interim spousal maintenance, indemnity, and litigation funding she sought. The court was also required to consider the interim orders sought by the respondent.

McClelland DCJ dismissed the applicant's interim application. While the specific reasoning for the dismissal of the substantive interim orders is not detailed in the provided text, the court did make a consent order requiring the applicant to deliver up a vehicle and the respondent's personal items within 14 days. The court also dismissed the interim orders sought by both the applicant and the respondent.