Fabcot Pty Ltd v Mosman Municipal Council (No 2)

Case [2021] NSWLEC 1730


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: FABCOT PTY LTD v Mosman Municipal Council (No 2) [2021] NSWLEC 1730
Hearing dates: 5-6 October 2021
Date of orders: 1 December 2021
Decision date: 01 December 2021
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Horton C
Decision:

The Court orders that:

1) The appeal is upheld.

2) Development consent is granted for Development Application DA8.2020.24.1 seeking consent for the partial demolition of six existing terraces, construction of a part-one, part-two storey development with retention and restoration of existing Military Road facades, and use for a Woolworths Metro supermarket and café, at-grade car park, loading area, associated signage and landscaping works at 731-741 Military Road, Mosman, subject to those conditions of consent at Annexure A.

3) All exhibits are returned, except for Exhibits A, E, L and 10.

Catchwords:

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION –Military Road heritage conservation area – Mosman junction Business Centre – traffic and parking impact – assessment of car parking provision – proposed lane widening – acoustic assessment - orders

Legislation Cited:

Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 4.16

Cases Cited:

FABCOT PTY LTD v Mosman Municipal Council [2021] NSWLEC 1665

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: FABCOT PTY LTD (Applicant)
Mosman Municipal Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
A Galasso SC (Applicant)
A Pickles SC (Respondent) with M Staunton

Solicitors:
Mills Oakley (Applicant)
HWL Ebsworth (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2020/349292
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In a judgment given on 2 November 2021, the Court gave its decision FABCOT PTY LTD v Mosman Municipal Council [2021] NSWLEC 1665 in respect of Development Application DA8.2020.24.1 seeking consent for the partial demolition of six existing terraces, construction of a part-one, part-two storey development with retention and restoration of existing Military Road facades, and use for a Woolworths Metro supermarket and café, at-grade car park, loading area, associated signage and landscaping works at 731-741 Military Road, Mosman.

  2. In my preliminary judgment, I determined that the development the subject of the development application warrants the grant of consent in accordance with s 4.16 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act), subject to conformance with certain directions made by the Court.

  3. On 17 November 2021, the parties complied with the Court’s directions. Amended architectural plans and agreed conditions of consent, consistent with my findings, were filed with the Court.

  4. As the parties have now complied with the directions at [200] of my preliminary judgment of 2 November 2021, it is appropriate to make orders granting development consent in accordance with s 4.16 of the EPA Act.

Orders

  1. The Court orders that:

  1. The appeal is upheld.

  2. Development consent is granted for Development Application DA8.2020.24.1 seeking consent for the partial demolition of six existing terraces, construction of a part-one, part-two storey development with retention and restoration of existing Military Road facades, and use for a Woolworths Metro supermarket and café, at-grade car park, loading area, associated signage and landscaping works at 731-741 Military Road, Mosman, subject to those conditions of consent at Annexure A.

  3. All exhibits are returned, except for Exhibits A, E, L and 10.

……………………

T Horton

Commissioner of the Court

(Annexure A) (391881, pdf)

**********

Details
AGLC
Fabcot Pty Ltd v Mosman Municipal Council (No 2) [2021] NSWLEC 1730
Case
[2021] NSWLEC 1730
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appeal was brought by Fabcot Pty Ltd against Mosman Municipal Council concerning the granting of development consent for a proposed development at 731-741 Military Road, Mosman. Fabcot sought to partially demolish six existing terraces and construct a two-storey development, including a Woolworths Metro supermarket and café, an at-grade car park, loading area, associated signage, and landscaping works. The primary legal issues centred on whether the development consent should be granted, considering the implications on the local community, the aesthetic impact on the area, and the alignment with the local planning policies and objectives.

The Court considered the statutory and policy framework governing development applications in New South Wales. The Court examined whether the proposed development complied with the Local Environment Plan and whether the development was in accordance with the council's planning policies and objectives. The Court also considered the impact of the proposed development on the character and amenity of the local area, including the aesthetic considerations, the effects on neighbouring properties, and the public interest. The Court found that the proposed development was consistent with the planning policies and objectives and did not have an unacceptable adverse impact on the local area. The Court held that the development consent should be granted, subject to certain conditions.

In light of the Court's findings, the appeal was upheld, and development consent was granted for the proposed development. The Court imposed conditions to mitigate any adverse impacts on the local area, including requirements for landscaping, signage, and the retention and restoration of existing Military Road facades. The Court also ordered that certain exhibits be returned, except for Exhibits A, E, L, and 10.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Court orders that:

1) The appeal is upheld.

2) Development consent is granted for Development Application DA8.2020.24.1 seeking consent for the partial demolition of six existing terraces, construction of a part-one, part-two storey development with retention and restoration of existing Military Road facades, and use for a Woolworths Metro supermarket and café, at-grade car park, loading area, associated signage and landscaping works at 731-741 Military Road, Mosman, subject to those conditions of consent at Annexure A.

3) All exhibits are returned, except for Exhibits A, E, L and 10.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.