Everett v The State of Western Australia
Case
•
[2001] WADC 18
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Everett v The State of Western Australia [2001] WADC 18
[2001] WADC 18
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Everett v The State of Western Australia was a case heard by the District Court of Western Australia. The plaintiff, David Francis Everett, was an inmate of Casuarina Prison at the time of the incident and sought damages for negligence against the State of Western Australia, which had care and control of the prison and employed the prison officers. The plaintiff alleged that he was assaulted by another inmate, Wayne Napier, and that the State breached its duty of care by failing to monitor, supervise, and control the movements and activities of the inmates, and by not warning or reassuring the plaintiff about the circumstances leading to the assault. The State denied the allegations and argued that it could not be held vicariously liable for the actions of its employees under s 111 of the Prisons Act 1981. The court held that the State was a "person" within the meaning of s 111 and that the provision provided a complete defence to the plaintiff's claim. The court also found that the plaintiff had not established a breach of duty of care by the State. The action was dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
-
Prison Law
Legal Concepts
-
Standing
-
Breach of Duty of Care
-
Vicarious Liability
-
Jurisdiction
-
Limitation Periods
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Trevorrow v South Australia (No 5) [2007] SASC 285
Cases Citing This Decision
16
Hawkins v The State of Western Australia
[2006] WADC 103
Hawkins v The State of Western Australia
[2006] WADC 103
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
0
White v Johnston
[2015] NSWCA 18
White v Johnston
[2015] NSWCA 18
Bird v DP (a pseudonym)
[2024] HCA 41