| [2025] FWCA 756 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Everability Group Limited
(AG2025/229)
EVERABILITY GROUP LIMITED ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024-2027
| Social, community, home care and disability services | |
| COMMISSIONER SCHNEIDER | PERTH, 26 FEBRUARY 2025 |
Application for approval of the EverAbility Group Limited Enterprise Agreement 2024-2027
Everability Group Limited (the Applicant) has made an application for the approval of an enterprise agreement known as the EverAbility Group Limited Enterprise Agreement 2024-2027 (the Agreement). The application was made under section 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declarations, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of sections 186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Health Services Union (the Union), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under section 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with section 201(2) of the Act, and based on the declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the Union is covered by the Agreement.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with section 54 of the Act, will operate from 5 March 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2027.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE528196 PR784796>
- AGLC
- Everability Group Limited [2025] FWCA 756
- Case
- [2025] FWCA 756
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the Enterprise Agreement 2024-2027 complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the Commission needed to assess whether the agreement had been made "in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Act." This involved examining whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated and whether it included essential minimum terms. The Commission also considered whether the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and whether it provided fair and reasonable outcomes.
In its decision, the Commission meticulously reviewed the negotiation process and the contents of the agreement. It concluded that the agreement had been genuinely negotiated between the parties and that it included all the required essential minimum terms. The Commission found that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees, as it provided a fair and reasonable outcome. Consequently, the Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement 2024-2027, certifying it as meeting all the legal requirements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.