Euston and Euston (No. 2)

In the matter of *Euston and Euston (No. 2)*, Bennett J of the Family Court of Australia considered competing interim applications for parenting orders and interim financial matters between the parties. The proceedings also involved the sale of the former matrimonial home located in Tasmania and another property in Victoria.

The court was required to determine adjustments to existing parenting orders concerning the time to be spent with the parties' three sons, born in 1993, 1994, and 2000, during the upcoming school holidays. Additionally, the court needed to address the interim distribution of proceeds from the sale of the former matrimonial home in Victoria.

The decision reflects a procedural step in the ongoing litigation, with the court adjourning the applications to a later date for determination. The parties were directed to file and serve further affidavit material within a specified timeframe prior to the adjourned hearing. Furthermore, the husband was ordered to return executed authority documents for the sale of the Tasmanian property to the wife's solicitors within fourteen days before the adjourned hearing. The court also made orders by consent regarding minutes of amended consent orders, directing that these be engrossed, certified, and filed with the court.