[2013] FWCA 5974 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210 - Application for approval of a variation of an enterprise agreement
Eugenia Pty Ltd T/A McDowall Chatterbox Child Development and Child Care Centre
(AG2013/2319)
MCDOWALL CHATTERBOX CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND CHILD CARE CENTRE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2009
Children's services | |
COMMISSIONER BOOTH | BRISBANE, 23 AUGUST 2013 |
Application for variation of the McDowall Chatterbox Child Development and Child Care Centre Enterprise Agreement 2009.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to an enterprise agreement known as the McDowall Chatterbox Child Development and Child Care Centre Enterprise Agreement 2009 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) by Eugenia Pty Ltd T/A McDowall Chatterbox Child Development and Child Care Centre.
[2] The variation contains a typographical error in Item A. which should be corrected. Pursuant to s.586 of the Act the error is corrected as follows:
By deleting the reference to Appendix E and replacing the reference as Appendix H in Item A.
[3] The variation can be found at Attachment 1 to this decision.
[4] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 as are relevant to this application for approval of a variation have been met.
[5] The variation to the Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.216 of the Act, will operate on and from 23 August 2013.
[6] A consolidated version of the Agreement as varied is attached.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE873142 PR540544>
- AGLC
- Eugenia Pty Ltd T/A McDowall Chatterbox Child Development and Child Care Centre [2013] FWCA 5974
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 5974
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the proposed changes to employee classification and remuneration were necessary to address changes in the business environment and whether the changes were fair and reasonable. The applicant argued that the changes were necessary to remain competitive and to ensure the financial sustainability of the business. The respondent union argued that the changes would negatively impact the employees' working conditions and were not justified. The Commission had to weigh the applicant's need for financial sustainability against the employees' right to fair and reasonable working conditions as protected by the Fair Work Act.
The Fair Work Commission found that the applicant had demonstrated a genuine need for the changes due to the challenging economic environment and the need to maintain the business's financial viability. The Commission considered the evidence presented by both parties and concluded that the proposed changes were reasonable and necessary. The Commission also took into account the importance of maintaining a skilled workforce in the early childhood education sector. As a result, the application for variation was approved, with specific terms and conditions outlined in the order. This decision allowed the applicant to implement the necessary changes while ensuring that the employees' rights were protected to a reasonable extent.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.