| [2014] FWCA 8937 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Estia Investments Pty Ltd
(AG2014/7907)
ESTIA HEALTH AND AWU - QUEENSLAND AGED CARE EMPLOYEES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Health and welfare services | |
COMMISSIONER JOHNS | MELBOURNE, 10 DECEMBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the Estia Health and AWU - Queensland Aged Care Employees Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] On 17 October 2014 Miles Witt Partnership on behalf of Estia Investments Pty Ltd (Applicant) made an application for approval of the Estia Health and AWU - Queensland Aged Care Employees Enterprise Agreement 2014 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The Agreement was lodged within 14 days after it was made.
[3] The Commission is satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[4] The Australian Workers’ Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s 201(2), the Commission notes that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s 54 of the Act the Agreement will operate from 17 December 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE411700 PR558856>
- AGLC
- Estia Investments Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 8937
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 8937
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission involved determining whether the enterprise agreement was a "good faith" bargain, whether it complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act, and if it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. Additionally, the Commission had to consider if the agreement satisfied the "better off overall test," ensuring that employees were not worse off by being covered under the agreement compared to their previous conditions.
The Fair Work Commission assessed the agreement, focusing on its provisions concerning wages, hours of work, leave entitlements, and other employment conditions. The Commission found that the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act, including the good faith test and the better off overall test. The Commission concluded that the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment and approved the Estia Health and AWU - Queensland Aged Care Employees Enterprise Agreement 2014. The decision was made on the basis that the agreement did not disadvantage employees and provided for their fair remuneration and working conditions.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.