| [2018] FWCA 3 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Essilor Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2017/4526)
ESSILOR AUSTRALIA (SILVERWATER) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2017 - 2020
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 2 JANUARY 2018 |
Application for approval of the Essilor Australia (Silverwater) Enterprise Agreement 2017 - 2020.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Essilor Australia (Silverwater) Enterprise Agreement 2017 – 2020 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Essilor Australia Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 9 January 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2020
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE426766 PR599151>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Essilor Australia Pty Ltd [2018] FWCA 3
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 3
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement contained provisions that were contrary to the provisions of section 231 of the Fair Work Act, which prohibits terms in enterprise agreements that unfairly discriminate against a class of employees, and whether the agreement was in accordance with the requirements of the Act. Specifically, the Commission had to determine whether certain provisions of the agreement, which related to the payment of allowances to employees, unfairly discriminated against a class of employees by treating them less favourably than other employees. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement met the requirements of section 232 of the Act, which sets out the process for making an enterprise agreement.
In its decision, the Commission found that the agreement did contain provisions that unfairly discriminated against a class of employees. The Commission held that the agreement treated employees who were employed on a part-time or casual basis less favourably than full-time employees by providing them with lower allowances. However, the Commission also found that the agreement was in accordance with the requirements of the Act, as the parties had followed the process set out in section 232 of the Act in making the agreement. The Commission approved the agreement, subject to certain modifications to address the discriminatory provisions.
The Commission's final orders were that the Essilor Australia (Silverwater) Enterprise Agreement 2017-2020 be approved, subject to modifications to the provisions relating to the payment of allowances to employees. The modifications required Essilor Australia to consult with the union to determine whether it was possible to provide equal allowances to all employees, and if not, to provide the union with written reasons for the unequal treatment. The Commission also ordered that the agreement be registered with the Fair Work Commission.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.