[2013] FWCA 420 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Ertech Pty Ltd
(AG2012/13052)
ERTECH PTY LTD WHEATSTONE PROJECT AGREEMENT 2012
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MCCARTHY | PERTH, 18 JANUARY 2013 |
Application for approval of the Ertech Pty Ltd Wheatstone Project Agreement 2012.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Ertech Pty Ltd Wheatstone Project Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a greenfields agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days from the date of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is four years from the date of this decision.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE899446 PR533308>
- AGLC
- Ertech Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 420
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 420
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the Wheatstone Project Agreement 2012 complied with the statutory requirements for project agreements and whether the agreement was in the public interest. The court had to examine whether the agreement adequately addressed matters such as the management of the project, financial arrangements, environmental protection, and the rights of the project participant. The court also needed to ensure that the agreement was consistent with the broader objectives of the National Offshore Petroleum Titles Act, including the sustainable development of Australia's offshore petroleum resources.
In delivering its judgment, the court meticulously reviewed the Wheatstone Project Agreement 2012 against the statutory framework. It found that the agreement comprehensively addressed the necessary matters, including the management structure, financial provisions, environmental safeguards, and the rights of the project participant. The court was satisfied that the agreement was designed to promote the efficient and responsible development of the Wheatstone Project while safeguarding public and environmental interests. After evaluating all the evidence and submissions, the court concluded that the Wheatstone Project Agreement 2012 met the statutory requirements and was in the public interest. Consequently, the court granted the application for approval of the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.