Ericsson and Jarrold (No.9)

In the matter of *Ericsson and Jarrold (No.9)*, Judge Mercuri considered an application by the father, which had been amended. The specific nature of the dispute between the parties is not detailed in the provided text, but it involved an initiating application by the father.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the father's initiating application should be dismissed. The court was also required to consider an application for costs made by the mother.

Judge Mercuri ordered the dismissal of the father's initiating application. The court also made directions regarding the mother's application for costs, requiring her to file and serve submissions in support within 14 days, followed by the father's opportunity to file submissions in reply. The orders also included particulars of obligations and consequences of contravention pursuant to section 65DA(2) of the *Family Law Act 1975*, and noted information about support services under section 62B of the same Act.