Eracom Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Wibowo

Eracom Technologies Australia Pty Ltd brought an application for further disclosure against Wibowo, who resisted the application. The dispute involved the discovery of documents, specifically the schedules to the Master Distributor Agreement. The case was heard in the Supreme Court of Victoria. The primary legal issue was whether the defendant was required to disclose the schedules to the Master Distributor Agreement, and if so, what should be done about any confidential information contained in those documents.
The court found that the schedules to the Master Distributor Agreement should be disclosed, but the disclosure should be done with appropriate undertakings to protect any confidential information. The court noted that the parties had not been able to agree on the terms of such an order, so the matter would be adjourned to a later date to allow the parties to negotiate. If the parties could not come to an agreement, the matter would be dealt with by the court. The court also granted liberty to apply if further disclosure was necessary.
The court ordered that the defendants were to disclose the schedules to the Master Distributor Agreement within seven days of the order. If the parties could not agree on the terms of an order to appropriately deal with any confidential information, the issue would be dealt with by the court. The application was adjourned to a date to be fixed, and the court granted liberty to apply.