| [2024] FWCA 3280 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Equans Fire Protection Services Pty Ltd
(AG2024/3530)
EQUANS FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES PTY LTD AND CEPU – PLUMBING DIVISION (VIC) FIRE PROTECTION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024 – 2026
| Plumbing industry | |
| COMMISSIONER JOHNS | MELBOURNE, 17 SEPTEMBER 2024 |
Application for approval of the Equans Fire Protection Services Pty Ltd and CEPU – Plumbing Division (Vic) Fire Protection Enterprise Agreement 2024 – 2026.
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Equans Fire Protection Services Pty Ltd and CEPU – Plumbing Division (Vic) Fire Protection Enterprise Agreement 2024 – 2026. (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Equans Fire Protection Services Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 24 September 2024. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 August 2026.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE526089 PR779289>
- AGLC
- Equans Fire Protection Services Pty Ltd [2024] FWCA 3280
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 3280
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission examined the provisions of the Fair Work Act and the nature of the agreement. It considered whether the agreement provided for minimum terms and conditions, including rates of pay, hours of work, and other entitlements, and whether it allowed for the resolution of workplace disputes. The Commission also assessed if the agreement was negotiated fairly, in accordance with the Act's requirements for genuine bargaining. The applicant argued that the agreement met all necessary criteria and was the product of fair negotiations. The respondent contested certain terms, arguing they did not comply with the Act and were not fairly negotiated.
The Commission concluded that the agreement contained all mandatory terms and conditions and was fairly negotiated. It found that the provisions regarding pay, leave, and dispute resolution were comprehensive and adhered to the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The Commission accepted that the negotiations were genuine and not marred by any unfair practices. Therefore, the Commission approved the agreement, finding it to be in compliance with the legislative requirements. The decision was made in the interest of ensuring that the terms of the agreement provided adequate protection and fair treatment for employees while allowing for effective management by the employer.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.