Eptec Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWCA 811


[2025] FWCA 811

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Eptec Pty Ltd

(AG2025/457)

INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024

Manufacturing and associated industries

COMMISSIONER SLOAN

SYDNEY, 5 MARCH 2025

Application for approval of the Infrastructure Solutions Enterprise Agreement 2024

  1. Eptec Pty Ltd t/as Infrastructure Solutions has applied for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Infrastructure Solutions Enterprise Agreement 2024 (“Agreement”). The application is made under s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  2. I have a minor concern with the notice of employee representational rights that was provided to employees. It gave notice that Eptec was bargaining for an enterprise agreement “which is proposed to cover employees that perform remediation work on sites for Eptec Pty Ltd…in the classifications contained in the Agreement”. The NERR was provided to employees on 22 October 2024. The Agreement was provided to employees on 4 February 2025. At least as a matter of logic, the employees cannot have known what “classifications [were] contained in the Agreement” without having seen it. That said, the Agreement appears to be a replacement for an existing enterprise agreement that applies to the employees. On that basis, I consider this to be a minor procedural or technical error of the nature contemplated by s 188(5) of the Act. I am satisfied that the employees are not likely to have been disadvantaged by the error. As a result, I will disregard it.

  3. The Agreement does not in direct terms contain a definition of shiftworker “for the purposes of the National Employment Standards”, as required by s 196(2) of the Act. However, clause 20.3 of the Agreement sets out the rate at which annual leave will accrue for “Continuous Shift Workers”, which is consistent with the entitlement in s 87(1)(b) of the Act. That clause can be read with clause 31(b) which defines “Continuous shift work”. I am satisfied that the Agreement defines or describes employees as shiftworkers for the purposes of the NES. (I am mindful that in its declaration in support of the application, Eptec stated that it does not roster employees on continuous shifts.)

  4. Clause 21 of the Agreement is titled Personal Leave. Clause 21.3 requires an employee to inform their supervisor “immediately” if they will be absent on personal or carer’s leave. However, s 107(2)(a) of the Act provides that an employee must give notice “as soon as practicable (which may be a time after the leave has started)”. On its terms, the Agreement imposes a more onerous obligation on employees. That said, clause 7 of the Agreement provides that where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES, and the NES provides a greater benefit to employees, the NES will prevail to the extent of the inconsistency. This should ensure that clause 21.3 is not applied in a manner contrary to the NES. In raising the issue, it is my intention to ensure that this is the case.

  5. Having regard to these matters, and the material in the application and accompanying declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act as are relevant to the application have been met.

  6. The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s 54 of the Act, the Agreement will operate from 12 March 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 5 March 2029.


COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE528249  PR784956>

Details
AGLC
Eptec Pty Ltd [2025] FWCA 811
Case
[2025] FWCA 811
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Eptec Pty Ltd sought approval for the Infrastructure Solutions Enterprise Agreement 2024 in the Fair Work Commission. The agreement was intended to govern the terms and conditions of employment for employees within the company. The application was opposed by several unions and employees who argued that the agreement did not adequately protect employee rights and conditions.

The key legal issues before the commission were whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for an enterprise agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees. The commission considered whether the agreement provided for minimum entitlements, such as minimum wages, leave entitlements, and penalty rates, and whether it allowed for appropriate consultation and dispute resolution mechanisms.

After considering submissions from both parties and reviewing the contents of the agreement, the commission found that the Infrastructure Solutions Enterprise Agreement 2024 did meet the statutory requirements. The commission determined that the agreement provided for minimum entitlements, allowed for appropriate consultation, and contained adequate dispute resolution mechanisms. Consequently, the commission approved the agreement, noting that while there were areas of concern, the overall balance of the agreement was fair and reasonable. The decision was made in the interest of achieving a workable agreement that would benefit both the employer and employees.

The commission approved the Infrastructure Solutions Enterprise Agreement 2024, effective from the date of the decision. The agreement was to be registered with the Fair Work Commission and would apply to the relevant employees of Eptec Pty Ltd. The unions and employees were given the opportunity to appeal the decision to the Federal Court within 21 days of the decision date.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.