Epic Games, Inc v Apple Inc
Case
•
[2025] FCA 900
•12 August 2025
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Epic Games, Inc v Apple Inc [2025] FCA 900
[2025] FCA 900
12 August 2025
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Epic Games Inc. sued Apple Inc. over Apple's practices in operating the App Store for iOS devices, which Epic claims restrict competition. The Federal Court of Australia heard the case. The central legal issues involved whether Apple abused its market power by imposing restrictive conditions on app developers and whether these practices substantially lessened competition. Specifically, the court needed to determine if Apple's practices amounted to misuse of market power, restrictive conduct, and contraventions of competition and consumer laws.
The court examined the market definitions, Apple's market power, and the impact of its practices on competition. It found that Apple's control over the App Store and its policies created barriers for developers, limiting their ability to offer alternative payment methods and thus restricting competition. The court concluded that Apple's practices contravened sections 45 and 46 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010, as they were likely to substantially lessen competition in the distribution services market and the market for payment services. Additionally, the court found that Apple's conduct could be considered unconscionable under the Australian Consumer Law.
Based on these findings, the court ordered the further hearing of the proceeding to be stood over to a later date, with specific restrictions on the disclosure and publication of the judgment's content. The court reserved its decision on costs and allowed for applications to be made regarding the case.
The court examined the market definitions, Apple's market power, and the impact of its practices on competition. It found that Apple's control over the App Store and its policies created barriers for developers, limiting their ability to offer alternative payment methods and thus restricting competition. The court concluded that Apple's practices contravened sections 45 and 46 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010, as they were likely to substantially lessen competition in the distribution services market and the market for payment services. Additionally, the court found that Apple's conduct could be considered unconscionable under the Australian Consumer Law.
Based on these findings, the court ordered the further hearing of the proceeding to be stood over to a later date, with specific restrictions on the disclosure and publication of the judgment's content. The court reserved its decision on costs and allowed for applications to be made regarding the case.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Competition Law
Legal Concepts
-
Market Definition
-
Market Power
-
Restrictive Conduct
-
Misuse of Market Power
-
Unconscionable Conduct
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Anthony v Apple Inc [2025] FCA 902
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Epic Games, Inc v Google LLC
[2025] FCA 901
Anthony v Apple Inc
[2025] FCA 902
Epic Games, Inc v Google LLC
[2025] FCA 901
Cases Cited
25
Statutory Material Cited
2
Epic Games, Inc v Google LLC
[2025] FCA 901
Anthony v Apple Inc
[2025] FCA 902
AHG WA (2015) Pty Ltd v Mercedes-Benz Australia/Pacific Pty Ltd
[2023] FCA 1022