Energy Queensland Limited T/A Ergon Energy Queensland Retail

Case [2017] FWCA 6760


[2017] FWCA 6760

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

decision

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Energy Queensland Limited T/A Ergon Energy Queensland Retail

(AG2017/5404)

Energy Queensland Union Collective Agreement 2017

Electrical power industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT ASBURY

BRISBANE, 18 DECEMBER 2017

Application for approval of the Energy Queensland Union Collective Agreement 2017.

  1. Energy Queensland Limited T/A Ergon Energy Queensland Retail applies for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Energy Queensland Union Collective Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

  1. The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU); the Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia (APESMA); the Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU); and the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU), being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have each given notice under s.183 of the Act that these organisations want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers these organisations.

  1. On 11 December 2017 undertakings were provided by the Employer. The views of the bargaining representatives have been sought in relation to the undertakings. Pursuant to s.190 of the Act, I accept the Employer’s undertakings. In accordance with s.201(3) of the Act I note that a copy of the undertakings is attached to the Agreement and forms part of the Agreement.

  1. The Agreement does not contain a consultation term that is consistent with the requirements in s.205 of the Act. Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The Agreement is approved in accordance with s.54 of the Act and will operate from 25 December 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 March 2021.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code O, AE426562  PR598770>

Details
AGLC
Energy Queensland Limited T/A Ergon Energy Queensland Retail [2017] FWCA 6760
Case
[2017] FWCA 6760
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Energy Queensland Limited, trading as Ergon Energy Queensland Retail, applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the Energy Queensland Union Collective Agreement 2017. The application involved various aspects of the agreement, including the process by which the agreement was formed and its compliance with the Fair Work Act 2009.

The primary legal issues before the court were whether the collective agreement was made in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act, and whether it complied with the procedural requirements for making such agreements. The court was also required to consider if the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment.

The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was made in accordance with the Fair Work Act, as the union and the employer had engaged in good faith bargaining. The commission also determined that the agreement complied with the procedural requirements and provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. Consequently, the court approved the Energy Queensland Union Collective Agreement 2017, considering it to be a genuine and fair agreement between the union and the employer.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Energy Queensland Union Collective Agreement 2017, finding that it was made in accordance with the Fair Work Act, complied with the procedural requirements, and provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. The commission's decision was based on the evidence presented, which demonstrated that the union and the employer had engaged in good faith bargaining, and the agreement reflected the terms agreed upon by both parties.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.