EMMETT & EMMETT
Case
•
[2011] FamCAFC 213
•29 July 2011
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
EMMETT & EMMETT [2011] FamCAFC 213
[2011] FamCAFC 213
29 July 2011
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Emmett and Emmett involved a dispute between the wife and the husband over various family law matters, including property settlement, spousal maintenance, and parenting arrangements. The case was heard in the Family Court of Australia, where the wife sought leave to appeal certain orders made by Watts J. The court was required to determine whether the wife was granted leave to file her appeals out of time and to set the conditions for the security of costs for the appeals.
The central legal issues were whether the wife could be granted leave to file her appeals beyond the statutory time limits and, if so, what conditions should be imposed to ensure that the appeals were not frivolous or an abuse of process. The court also had to decide on the appropriate amount of security for costs to be paid by the wife and how the money should be held and managed.
The court found that the wife's applications for leave to appeal out of time were made with sufficient particularity and that exceptional circumstances existed to justify the delay. The court granted the wife leave to file her notices of appeal out of time and extended the time within which the appeals could be filed. The court also ordered that the wife pay a sum of $27,000.00 as security for the costs of the appeals to the husband’s solicitors trust account. The court further directed that the moneys be held in a separate account and only be dispersed upon further order of the court. Additionally, the court ruled that each party bear their own costs of the application for security for costs. The appeals were to be heard together if the wife paid the required security within the specified timeframe.
The central legal issues were whether the wife could be granted leave to file her appeals beyond the statutory time limits and, if so, what conditions should be imposed to ensure that the appeals were not frivolous or an abuse of process. The court also had to decide on the appropriate amount of security for costs to be paid by the wife and how the money should be held and managed.
The court found that the wife's applications for leave to appeal out of time were made with sufficient particularity and that exceptional circumstances existed to justify the delay. The court granted the wife leave to file her notices of appeal out of time and extended the time within which the appeals could be filed. The court also ordered that the wife pay a sum of $27,000.00 as security for the costs of the appeals to the husband’s solicitors trust account. The court further directed that the moneys be held in a separate account and only be dispersed upon further order of the court. Additionally, the court ruled that each party bear their own costs of the application for security for costs. The appeals were to be heard together if the wife paid the required security within the specified timeframe.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Limitation Periods
-
Costs
-
Security for Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
EMMETT & EMMETT [2011] FamCAFC 213
Most Recent Citation
BANDREY & WOLDORE
[2013] FamCAFC 208
Cases Citing This Decision
6
Myers and Myers
[2012] FamCA 300
BANDREY & WOLDORE
[2013] FamCAFC 208
LAWRENCE & TAN
[2012] FamCAFC 62
Cases Cited
16
Statutory Material Cited
2
Gallo v Dawson
[1990] HCA 30
Equity Access Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation
[1989] FCA 361
Re JJT; Ex Parte Victoria Legal Aid
[1998] HCA 44