Emergency Services Telecommunications Authority T/A ESTA

Case [2022] FWCA 213


[2022] FWCA 213

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Emergency Services Telecommunications Authority T/A ESTA

(AG2021/9187)

Emergency Services Telecommunications Authority Support Staff Enterprise Agreement 2021

Telecommunications services

COMMISSIONER O'NEILL

MELBOURNE, 27 JANUARY 2022

Application for approval of the Emergency Services Telecommunications Authority Support Staff Enterprise Agreement 2021

  1. ESTA has applied for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Emergency Services Telecommunications Authority Support Staff Enterprise Agreement 2021 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) and is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

  1. I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

·           Clause 33.9 – Carer’s Leave; and

·           Clauses 35.4 and 35.5 – Family Violence Leave – Eligibility.

However, noting the undertakings given by the Employer, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 3 February 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2025.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE514716  PR737779>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Emergency Services Telecommunications Authority T/A ESTA [2022] FWCA 213
Case
[2022] FWCA 213
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of the Fair Work Commission, the Emergency Services Telecommunications Authority, trading as ESTA, applied for approval of the Emergency Services Telecommunications Authority Support Staff Enterprise Agreement 2021. The application was heard by Deputy President M. J. A. Connolly. The dispute centred on whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly in terms of the agreement's impact on the employees' working conditions and the authority's operational needs.

The central legal issues before the court were whether the agreement appropriately balanced the rights and interests of the employees and the employer, and if it complied with the good faith bargaining requirements under the Fair Work Act. Additionally, the court needed to determine if the agreement met the minimum standards for pay and conditions as prescribed by the Act, and if it adequately facilitated the efficient and productive operation of the employer's business.

The Fair Work Commission considered the evidence presented by both parties and the broader implications of the agreement for the employees and the organisation. The Commission found that the agreement was made in good faith and met the statutory requirements. It was concluded that the agreement appropriately balanced the interests of the employees and the employer, provided for fair and reasonable terms, and facilitated the efficient and productive operation of the employer's business. Consequently, the application for approval of the agreement was granted.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.