[2013] FWCA 9052 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Emergency Services Superannuation Board T/A ESSSuper
(AG2013/11038)
ESSSUPER ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013-2016
State and Territory government administration | |
COMMISSIONER WILSON | MELBOURNE, 18 NOVEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the ESSSuper Enterprise Agreement 2013-2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the ESSSuper Enterprise Agreement 2013-2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Emergency Services Superannuation Board T/A ESSSuper (ESSSuper). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I have accepted the undertakings attached to this decision and marked Annexure A, which have been provided by ESSSuper. The undertakings are attached to the Agreement and will be taken to be a term of the Agreement pursuant to s.191 of the Act.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[4] The Community and Public Sector Union (the CPSU), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the CPSU.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 25 November 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 12 June 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE405415 PR544662>
Annexure A:
- AGLC
- Emergency Services Superannuation Board T/A ESSSuper [2013] FWCA 9052
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 9052
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine whether the agreement met the requirements for a "single interest" enterprise agreement, whether it adhered to the good faith bargaining obligations, and whether the agreement was fair and reasonable in its terms. The court also had to consider the procedural fairness in the process leading up to the agreement.
The court found that the application met the statutory requirements for approval, emphasising the single interest nature of the agreement and the adherence to good faith bargaining. The court held that the agreement was fair and reasonable, taking into account the context and the economic circumstances at the time. The decision was based on the evidence presented, which demonstrated that the agreement was made in good faith and was beneficial to the employees. The court approved the enterprise agreement, allowing it to come into effect.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.