Ellis v Adventureworld (WA) Pty Ltd As Trustee of The Adventureworld Unit Trust
Case
•
[2016] FCCA 2504
•30 September 2016
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Ellis v Adventureworld (WA) Pty Ltd As Trustee of The Adventureworld Unit Trust [2016] FCCA 2504
[2016] FCCA 2504
30 September 2016
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Ellis v Adventureworld (WA) Pty Ltd As Trustee of The Adventureworld Unit Trust*, the applicant, Ms Ellis, brought a disability discrimination claim against the respondent, Adventureworld. The dispute concerned the respondent's application for costs following the applicant's failure to attend a scheduled hearing in person. The matter was heard in the Equal Opportunity Commission of Western Australia.
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the respondent was entitled to an award of costs against the applicant. A secondary issue was whether, if costs were awarded, they should be on an indemnity basis, given the applicant's non-attendance at the hearing.
The Commission considered the general principle that costs follow the event, but noted that in the Equal Opportunity Commission, costs are not awarded as of right. The Commission found that the applicant's failure to attend the hearing, without prior notification or a valid excuse, constituted an unreasonable act or omission. This failure caused the respondent to incur costs in preparing for and attending the hearing. The Commission determined that it was appropriate to award costs to the respondent, but declined to award indemnity costs, finding that the applicant, as a self-represented litigant who was not experienced in such matters, should not be subjected to the higher standard of indemnity costs.
The Commission ordered that the applicant pay the respondent's costs, to be assessed on a party and party basis.
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the respondent was entitled to an award of costs against the applicant. A secondary issue was whether, if costs were awarded, they should be on an indemnity basis, given the applicant's non-attendance at the hearing.
The Commission considered the general principle that costs follow the event, but noted that in the Equal Opportunity Commission, costs are not awarded as of right. The Commission found that the applicant's failure to attend the hearing, without prior notification or a valid excuse, constituted an unreasonable act or omission. This failure caused the respondent to incur costs in preparing for and attending the hearing. The Commission determined that it was appropriate to award costs to the respondent, but declined to award indemnity costs, finding that the applicant, as a self-represented litigant who was not experienced in such matters, should not be subjected to the higher standard of indemnity costs.
The Commission ordered that the applicant pay the respondent's costs, to be assessed on a party and party basis.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment Law
-
Negligence & Tort
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Damages
-
Duty of Care
-
Negligence
-
Standing
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Ellis v Adventureworld (WA) Pty Ltd As Trustee of The Adventureworld Unit Trust [2016] FCCA 2504
Most Recent Citation
Ellis v Junction Group Pty Ltd trading as v Burger Bar [2018] FCA 338
Cases Citing This Decision
3
Ellis v Junction Group Pty Ltd Trading As v Burger Bar
[2017] FCCA 1045
Ellis v Silver Vision Pty Ltd (No 2)
[2017] FCCA 151
Ellis v Junction Group Pty Ltd trading as v Burger Bar
[2018] FCA 338
Cases Cited
22
Statutory Material Cited
5
Fetherston v Peninsula Health (No. 2)
[2004] FCA 594
Nelson v Ji
[2015] FCCA 3573
Warren v Queensland Law Society Incorporated (No.2)
[2015] FCCA 2829