Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Elip Pty Ltd v City of Ryde Council [2018] NSWLEC 1292 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 15 June 2018 Date of orders: 15 June 2018 Decision date: 15 June 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Chilcott C Decision: See [4] below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979Category: Principal judgment Parties: Elip Pty Ltd (Applicant)
City of Ryde Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
F Berglund (Respondent)
J Tomaras, JT Law Pty Ltd (Applicant)
City of Ryde Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/81878 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act. As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The Applicant is granted leave to amend its application to rely on the plans detailed in condition 1 of Annexure ‘A’.
The Appeal is upheld.
Pursuant to Section 4.16(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, deferred commencement consent is granted to development application No. LDA2016/0070 for the construction of a garage, boat shed and stairs at 10A Pile Street, Gladesville NSW 2111, subject to the conditions of consent in Annexure ‘A’.
……………………….
Michael Chilcott
Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (222 KB, pdf)
Annexure B (2.92 MB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Elip Pty Ltd v City of Ryde Council [2018] NSWLEC 1292
- Case
- [2018] NSWLEC 1292
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court encompassed the interpretation of planning policies and the validity of the council's decision-making process. The appellant argued that the council's decision was flawed due to improper application of planning policies, while the respondent contended that the decision was correctly made within the legal framework. The court was tasked with determining whether the council's decision was based on an erroneous interpretation of the planning policies or if it was a valid exercise of discretionary power.
In reaching its decision, the court examined the evidence presented by both parties and the relevant planning policies. It found that the council had correctly interpreted the applicable planning policies and that its decision was not based on an erroneous interpretation. The court also assessed whether the decision was unreasonable, noting that the council had considered all relevant factors and followed proper procedures. Ultimately, the court upheld the council's decision, ruling that it was lawful and valid. The appellant's appeal was dismissed, and the council's decision remained in place.
Orders
Orders of the court
See [4] below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.