Eliot and Eliot and Anor

In the matter of *Eliot and Eliot and Anor*, Cronin J made final property orders and interim parenting orders by consent between the parties. The proceedings involved applications for parenting orders, which were subsequently struck out with a right to reinstate upon application supported by affidavit.

The court was required to determine the terms of the final property and interim parenting orders, and to address the removal of the children's names from the Airport Watch List. Additionally, the court was to provide reasons for its decision, which were to be transcribed and made available to the parties.

Cronin J's reasoning and the legal principles applied are not detailed in the provided text, as the orders were made by consent. However, the orders reflect the court's function in finalising property settlements and making parenting arrangements, as well as its power to direct the removal of names from watch lists and to provide information regarding compliance with court orders pursuant to sections 65DA(2) and 62B of the relevant legislation.

By consent, final property orders and interim parenting orders were made in accordance with minutes of proposed orders. Outstanding applications for parenting orders were struck out with a right to reinstate. Order 2 of the Federal Magistrate Hartnett's orders of 22 June 2011 was discharged, and the children's names were to be removed from the Airport Watch List. Reasons for the day's orders were to be transcribed and made available. The orders also included a Fact Sheet detailing obligations, consequences of contravention, and sources of assistance for compliance.