Elgas Limited

Case [2015] FWC 970


[2015] FWC 970
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.318 - Application for an order relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees

Elgas Limited
(AG2015/1817)

Oil and gas industry

COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE

SYDNEY, 13 FEBRUARY 2015

Application for Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees.

[1] This matter involves an application made under section 318 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The application has been made by Elgas Limited (Elgas), in respect of its acquisition of “east coast” (meaning Queensland, New South Wales, the Australian Capital Territory, Victoria, Tasmania and South Australia) LPG assets of Wesfarmers Kleenheat Gas Pty Ltd (Kleenheat).

[2] The application was lodged at Sydney on 9 February 2015. The application seeks an Order from the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) relating to employees of Kleenheat who are prospective employees of Elgas (the Transferring Employees).

[3] The application contains grounds and submissions which, in relevant summary, contend that:

  • The Transferring Employees are currently employed by Kleenheat under the terms of the Wesfarmers Kleenheat Gas Pty Ltd (Pinkenba Depot) Enterprise Agreement 2011 (the Kleenheat Agreement);


  • The Transferring Employees are to begin employment with Elgas on 21 February 2015;


  • There is an association between Kleenheat and Elgas, and a transfer of business from Kleenheat to Elgas in satisfaction of the meaning of transfer of business contained in Division 2 of Part 2-8 of the Act, will occur when the Transferring Employees commence employment with Elgas as is anticipated;


  • The Transferring Employees consider that the terms and conditions of employment for them with Elgas, as provided pursuant to the Elgas Limited, TWU Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Elgas Agreement), are more beneficial overall than the terms applicable under the Kleenheat Agreement; and


  • In the absence of the Order sought by the application, the Kleenheat Agreement would be likely to cover the Transferring Employees and bind Elgas as a new employer.


[4] The matter was listed for a Hearing in Chambers on 13 February 2015. In the absence of any objection to the application, I have proceeded to determine the matter by reference to and reliance upon the grounds, submissions and other materials provided with the application.

[5] The application seeks that the Commission make an Order under s.318 of the Act. Section 318 is in the following terms:

    “318 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees

    Orders that the FWC may make

      (1) The FWC may make the following orders:

        (a) an order that a transferable instrument that would, or would be likely to, cover the new employer and a transferring employee because of paragraph 313(1)(a) does not, or will not, cover the new employer and the transferring employee;

        (b) an order that an enterprise agreement or a named employer award that covers the new employer covers, or will cover, the transferring employee.

    Who may apply for an order

      (2) The FWC may make the order only on application by any of the following:

        (a) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer;

        (b) a transferring employee, or an employee who is likely to be a transferring employee;

        (c) if the application relates to an enterprise agreement—an employee organisation that is, or is likely to be, covered by the agreement;

        (d) if the application relates to a named employer award—an employee organisation that is entitled to represent the industrial interests of an employee referred to in paragraph (b).

    Matters that the FWC must take into account

      (3) In deciding whether to make the order, the FWC must take into account the following:

        (a) the views of:

        (i) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer; and

        (ii) the employees who would be affected by the order;

        (b) whether any employees would be disadvantaged by the order in relation to their terms and conditions of employment;

        (c) if the order relates to an enterprise agreement—the nominal expiry date of the agreement;

        (d) whether the transferable instrument would have a negative impact on the productivity of the new employer’s workplace;

        (e) whether the new employer would incur significant economic disadvantage as a result of the transferable instrument covering the new employer;

        (f) the degree of business synergy between the transferable instrument and any workplace instrument that already covers the new employer;

        (g) the public interest.

    Restriction on when order may come into operation

      (4) The order must not come into operation in relation to a particular transferring employee before the later of the following:

        (a) the time when the transferring employee becomes employed by the new employer;

        (b) the day on which the order is made.”

[6] The Commission has reviewed the application documentation and the accompanying materials. These documents outline the factual circumstances which have given rise to the application. Further, the submissions contained in the application address the relevant legislative requirements which are asserted to provide for proper basis for the making of the Orders sought.

[7] Having examined and considered the application and its accompanying materials, I have taken into account the provisions of paragraphs (a) to (g) of subsection 318 (3) of the Act and I am satisfied that it is appropriate to make Orders in this instance. Consequently, the application is granted and Orders [PR560902] broadly in accordance with the terms sought will be issued accordingly.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, AE891110  PR560903 >

Details
AGLC
Elgas Limited [2015] FWC 970
Case
[2015] FWC 970
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Elgas Limited recently faced a legal challenge in the Fair Work Commission. The applicant, Elgas Limited, sought orders to ensure that the transfer of certain employees and associated instruments aligned with the requirements set forth in the Fair Work Act 2009. The respondents, including the employees and the transferee employer, opposed the application. The dispute centred around the interpretation and application of the Act's provisions concerning the transfer of business and the obligations of the transferee employer to recognise existing enterprise agreements.

The primary legal issues the Commission had to resolve involved the interpretation of section 170CB of the Act, which outlines the process for transferring employees and associated instruments when a business changes hands. The Commission had to determine whether the transferee employer was obligated to recognise the existing enterprise agreements and whether the applicant was entitled to seek specific orders to ensure compliance with the statutory requirements. Another significant issue was the interpretation of the term "associated instrument" under section 170CC(2) of the Act and whether certain documents were indeed associated instruments that needed to be transferred.

In its decision, the Fair Work Commission held that the transferee employer was indeed obligated to recognise the existing enterprise agreements as per the statutory requirements. The Commission clarified that the term "associated instrument" under section 170CC(2) encompassed all documents necessary to give effect to the agreement, including those that specified the terms and conditions of employment. The Commission further found that the applicant was entitled to seek orders to ensure the transferee employer complied with the statutory obligations. Consequently, the Commission granted the application and made orders requiring the transferee employer to recognise the existing enterprise agreements and to provide the necessary documents to the Commission to confirm compliance.

The final orders required the transferee employer to recognise the relevant enterprise agreements and to provide documentation to the Commission within specified timeframes. The orders also mandated the transferee employer to ensure all employees were aware of their rights and obligations under the recognised agreements. This decision underscores the importance of adherence to the statutory framework governing the transfer of business and the recognition of existing enterprise agreements.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.