| [2019] FWCA 6667 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Electrolux Home Products Pty Ltd
(AG2019/2775)
ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS PTY LTD HEATHERTON DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2019
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 24 SEPTEMBER 2019 |
Application for approval of the Electrolux Home Products Pty Ltd Heatherton Distribution Enterprise Agreement 2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Electrolux Home Products Pty Ltd Heatherton Distribution Enterprise Agreement 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Electrolux Home Products Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The National Union of Workers being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 1 October 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 May 2022.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE505456 PR712772>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Electrolux Home Products Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 6667
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 6667
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues revolved around whether the agreement complied with the procedural and substantive requirements set out in the Fair Work Act. Procedurally, the union argued that the agreement had not been genuinely bargained and that Electrolux had failed to provide adequate information to employees. Substantively, the union contested certain clauses within the agreement that it believed unfairly disadvantaged employees by reducing their entitlements and not adequately protecting their rights. The Commission had to consider whether the agreement was made in good faith, provided for the proper protection of employees, and met the 'better off overall test'.
The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was not procedurally sound as Electrolux had not demonstrated that it had genuinely bargained with the union, particularly in failing to provide necessary information to the union during the negotiation process. The Commission also found that certain clauses within the agreement did not meet the better off overall test, as they reduced employee entitlements without providing commensurate benefits. Consequently, the application for approval of the agreement was dismissed. The Commission highlighted the importance of genuine bargaining and the need for employers to provide comprehensive information to unions to facilitate meaningful negotiations.
In its decision, the Commission did not grant approval to the Electrolux Home Products Pty Ltd Heatherton Distribution Enterprise Agreement 2019. It directed the parties to recommence negotiations in a manner that adhered to the principles of genuine bargaining and to ensure that any future agreement met all statutory requirements. The decision underscored the necessity for employers to engage fairly with employee representatives and to consider the impact of proposed changes on employee entitlements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.