Electrolux Home Products Pty Limited

Case [2019] FWCA 8039


[2019] FWCA 8039
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Electrolux Home Products Pty Limited
(AG2019/4266)

ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS ADELAIDE MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2019

Manufacturing and associated industries

COMMISSIONER PLATT

ADELAIDE, 28 NOVEMBER 2019

Application for approval of the Electrolux Home Products Adelaide Manufacturing Enterprise Agreement 2019.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Electrolux Home Products Adelaide Manufacturing Enterprise Agreement 2019 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Electrolux Home Products Pty Limited. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The matter was allocated to my Chambers on 19 November 2019.

[3] On 22 November 2019, I conducted a telephone conference with the parties to seek clarification about aspects of the Agreement and invited the Applicant to address these matters including through the provision of an undertaking.

[4] The Applicant has submitted an undertaking in the required form dated 26 November 2019. The undertaking deals with the following topics:

  In clause 13, transfer of employees means the transfer of employees between Electrolux worksites in South Australia.

  Section 65 of the Act, in relation to flexible working arrangements, is incorporated into the Agreement.

  For the purposes of calculating apprentice rates in Appendix 2 of the Agreement, the applicable C10 rate of pay is the rate for 1st Class Metal Finishers.

  Adult Apprentice rates are as follows; first year 61% of C10 rate, second year 66% of C10 rate, third year 75% of C10 rate, fourth year 88% of C10 rate.

  Each Apprentice will receive a tool allowance as if they were a tradesperson.

[5] A copy of the undertaking has been provided to the bargaining representatives and I have sought their views in accordance with s.190(4) of the Act. The bargaining representatives did not express any view on the undertaking.

[6] The undertaking appears to meet the requirements of s.190(3) of the Act and I have accepted it. As a result, the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[7] For the sake of clarity, clause 40 of the Agreement is more restrictive than s.65 of the Act. The NES precedence clause in the Agreement and the undertaking has the effect of expanding the circumstances where flexible working arrangements can be sought.

[8] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) and Australian Workers’ Union and Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers these organisations.

[9] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[10] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 days from the date of approval of the Agreement. The nominal expiry date is 27 November 2022.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE506233  PR714612>

Details
AGLC
Electrolux Home Products Pty Limited [2019] FWCA 8039
Case
[2019] FWCA 8039
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved Electrolux Home Products Pty Limited, who applied for approval of the Electrolux Home Products Adelaide Manufacturing Enterprise Agreement 2019. The Fair Work Commission was tasked with determining whether the agreement met the necessary requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009. The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement provided for fair terms and conditions, including minimum rates of pay, and whether it had been made in good faith. Additionally, the Commission needed to ensure that the agreement facilitated a productive workplace relationship and was free from any coercive conduct.

The Commission considered the evidence and submissions from both Electrolux and the relevant union. It found that the agreement contained all the mandated minimum terms and conditions, including fair rates of pay, and that the process leading to the agreement's formation was conducted in good faith. The Commission also concluded that the agreement was conducive to a productive workplace relationship and did not involve any improper conduct. As a result, the Commission approved the agreement, finding it to be fair and reasonable.

Following the approval, the Electrolux Home Products Adelaide Manufacturing Enterprise Agreement 2019 was registered with the Fair Work Commission. This registration meant that the agreement would govern the employment conditions of the relevant employees, ensuring they were covered by the fair terms and conditions set out in the agreement. The decision underscored the importance of both parties adhering to the legal requirements and processes when negotiating and finalising enterprise agreements.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.