[2013] FWCA 8230 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Electrical Suppliers (NSW) Pty Ltd
(AG2013/9369)
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIERS (NSW) PTY LTD SINGLE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Electrical contracting industry | |
COMMISSIONER RIORDAN | SYDNEY, 21 OCTOBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Electrical Suppliers (NSW) Pty Ltd Single Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Electrical Suppliers (NSW) Pty Ltd Single Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Electrical Suppliers (NSW) Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] Fair Work Commission received correspondence dated 13 October 2013, which included further material in support of the application together with Undertakings made by and duly signed by the Manager, Electrical Suppliers (NSW) Pty Ltd, proposed to FWC pursuant to s.190 of the Act (the Undertakings).
[4] I am prepared to accept the Undertakings. As provided by s.191 of the Act, the Undertakings are taken to be terms of the Agreement. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 21 October 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Undertaking
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE404884 PR543549>
- AGLC
- Electrical Suppliers (NSW) Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 8230
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 8230
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the process by which the agreement was negotiated and the content of the agreement itself. The Electrical Trades Union of Australia argued that the agreement did not adequately protect the employees' interests, particularly regarding pay rates and conditions. The company, on the other hand, contended that the agreement was the result of good faith negotiations and adequately covered the terms necessary for fair and reasonable employment conditions. The court considered the evidence presented by both parties and the statutory criteria for the approval of such agreements. It found that while the negotiations were conducted in good faith, the agreement did not sufficiently protect the employees' interests as required by the Fair Work Act. Therefore, the court did not approve the agreement.
The court's decision was based on a detailed examination of the agreement and the evidence provided by both parties. The court concluded that despite the good faith efforts in the negotiation process, the agreement failed to meet the statutory requirements for protecting employees’ interests. The court's ruling was grounded in its interpretation of the Fair Work Act and the specific provisions related to the approval of single enterprise agreements. The final orders of the court were that the application for the approval of the agreement be dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.