El-Hajje v Rissalah College Limited
Case
•
[2022] FedCFamC2G 260
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
El-Hajje v Rissalah College Limited [2022] FedCFamC2G 260
[2022] FedCFamC2G 260
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In this case, the applicant, Mr El-Hajje, alleged that the first respondent, Rissalah College, contravened s 340(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) by taking adverse action against him. The alleged contravention arose from Rissalah College’s purported termination of his employment, which it is said occurred because Mr El-Hajje exercised his workplace right to make complaints and inquiries in relation to his employment. The respondents applied to the Court that it determine certain questions separately from any other questions, and that it decide those questions adversely to Mr El-Hajje. The questions, in the alternative, are whether paragraphs of the statement of claim should be struck out because they disclose no reasonable cause of action based on a contravention of s 340(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). The Court ordered that the questions be determined separately from any other questions, and decided the questions in the manner stated in the preceding paragraph of the reasons. The proceeding was listed for directions at 9:30 am on 21 April 2022.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment & Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Breach of Contract
-
Unjust Enrichment
-
Adverse Possession
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Karen Tan v Viv May, Lisa Miscamble, Kathryn Baget-Juleff, Wingecarribee Shire Council [2025] FWC 548
Cases Citing This Decision
22
Kuot v Maxlife Care Pty Ltd
[2025] FedCFamC2G 517
Johnson v A.T. Kearney Australia Pty Ltd
[2024] FedCFamC2G 1388
Toki v All Class Training Pty Ltd
[2024] FedCFamC2G 566
Cases Cited
16
Statutory Material Cited
0
PIA Mortgage Services Pty Ltd v King
[2020] FCAFC 15
Ramos v Good Samaritan Industries (No 2)
[2011] FMCA 341
Lamont v University of Queensland (No 2)
[2020] FCA 720