| [2022] FWCA 1086 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a multi-enterprise agreement
Eifers Civil Pty Ltd
(AG2022/181)
Eifers Group Enterprise Agreement 2021-2025
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT CROSS | SYDNEY, 28 MARCH 2022 |
Application for approval of the Eifers Group Enterprise Agreement 2021-2025
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Eifers Group Enterprise Agreement 2021-2025 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Eifers Civil Group Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a multi-enterprise agreement.
The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement.
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days from the date of this approval. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 28 March 2026.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE515502 PR739758>
ANNEXURE A
- AGLC
- Eifers Civil Pty Ltd [2022] FWCA 1086
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 1086
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the agreement complied with the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine if the agreement provided for minimum terms and conditions, ensured fair and efficient workplace relations, and adhered to the relevant provisions of the Act. Additionally, the Commission had to consider whether the agreement had been made in good faith and whether it provided for a proper process for resolving disputes.
In delivering its decision, the Commission examined the terms of the agreement in detail. It found that the agreement contained provisions that met the statutory requirements, including those for minimum wages, hours of work, and other employment conditions. The Commission also considered evidence regarding the good faith of the parties and the processes for dispute resolution. Ultimately, the Commission was satisfied that the agreement was fair and appropriate, and approved it accordingly. The decision highlighted the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements provide for adequate terms and conditions and that they are made in good faith. The Commission's approval of the agreement provides clarity for both the employer and the union moving forward.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.