[2013] FWCA 1000 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
EEM Equipment Pty Ltd
(AG2012/14389)
EEM EQUIPMENT ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER GOOLEY | MELBOURNE, 13 FEBRUARY 2013 |
Application for approval of the EEM Equipment Enterprise Agreement.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the EEM Equipment Enterprise Agreement (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by EEM Equipment Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 11 February 2013 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 18 February 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 10 December 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE899858 PR534046>
ANNEXURE A
- AGLC
- EEM Equipment Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 1000
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 1000
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Court centred on whether the agreement complied with the statutory requirements for enterprise agreements under the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the Court needed to consider whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated and whether it contained all the prescribed minimum terms and conditions. Additionally, the Court had to examine whether the agreement would have a significant positive effect on workplace relations, as required by the Act.
The Court found that the agreement was indeed genuinely negotiated, as evidenced by the extensive bargaining process and the inclusion of all necessary parties. The Court also determined that the agreement contained all the prescribed minimum terms and conditions, and that it would have a significant positive effect on workplace relations. Consequently, the Court concluded that the agreement met all the statutory requirements and approved it under the Fair Work Act.
No further orders were made by the Court beyond the approval of the agreement. This decision confirms the validity of the EEM Equipment Enterprise Agreement, allowing it to govern the employment terms of the specified employees as intended.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.