[2014] FWCA 3196 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Edrill Pty Ltd
(AG2014/3866)
EDRILL ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Tasmania | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 14 MAY 2014 |
Application for approval of the Edrill Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the Edrill Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made by Edrill Pty Ltd pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The flexibility provision in clause 6 does not comply with the requirements in section 203 of the Act. Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement, and will be appended to the Agreement.
[3] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings given is attached to this decision at Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[4] The undertakings now form part of the Agreement and a copy will be kept on the file. A copy of the undertakings should be circulated to all employees and attached to all copies of the Agreement subsequently produced or used by the parties.
[5] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[6] The Agreement is approved, and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 21 May 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 February 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Annexure A:
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE408130 PR550586>
- AGLC
- Edrill Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 3196
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 3196
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central issue before the court was whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for endorsement under the Fair Work Act. The court had to determine if the agreement contained the necessary provisions, including minimum wages, penalty rates, leave entitlements, and other terms and conditions of employment. The court also needed to assess whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated and if it was in the best interests of the employees. Furthermore, the court examined whether the agreement complied with any relevant industrial instruments and if it was consistent with the Fair Work Act's objectives.
After considering the arguments presented by both parties, the court found that the agreement met the statutory requirements for endorsement. The court determined that the agreement contained all the necessary provisions and was genuinely negotiated. The court was satisfied that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and was consistent with the objectives of the Fair Work Act. The court also found that the agreement did not conflict with any relevant industrial instruments. Consequently, the court approved the Edrill Enterprise Agreement 2014 and ordered its registration.
The court's decision provided clarity and certainty for the applicant and its employees, ensuring that the agreement was legally binding and enforceable. The registration of the agreement facilitated the smooth operation of the applicant's business and provided a clear framework for the terms and conditions of employment for its employees. The court's approval of the agreement demonstrated its commitment to upholding the principles of the Fair Work Act and promoting harmonious industrial relations.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.