| [2015] FWCA 883 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
CORRECTION TO DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Edgarley Home Inc
(AG2014/8350)
EDGARLEY HOME INCORPORATED ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014-2017
Aged care industry | |
COMMISSIONER JOHNS | MELBOURNE, 18 MARCH 2015 |
Application for approval of the Edgarley Home Incorporated Enterprise Agreement 2014-2017.
[1] The decision [2015] FWCA 883 issued by the Fair Work Commission on 5 February 2015 is corrected as follows:
1. By deleting paragraph [5] and renumbering the subsequent paragraphs accordingly.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE412520 PR562119>
- AGLC
- Edgarley Home Inc [2015] FWCA 883
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 883
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the Commission had to determine were whether the agreement met the necessary standards for approval under the Fair Work Act, and if it provided fair and reasonable terms for the employees. This included examining if the agreement adequately protected employee rights, and if it adhered to the provisions outlined in the Act regarding enterprise agreements.
The Fair Work Commission, in correcting its earlier decision, confirmed that the agreement did indeed meet the statutory requirements for approval. The correction involved a minor adjustment to the decision's paragraph numbering, without altering the substance of the findings. The Commission found that the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms for the employees and did not contravene any provisions of the Fair Work Act. Consequently, the Commission approved the Edgarley Home Incorporated Enterprise Agreement 2014-2017.
No further orders were made by the Commission, and the corrected decision stood as the final outcome of the proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.