Edgar v Halle (No 2)
Case
•
[2010] FamCA 260
•12 April, 2010
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Edgar v Halle (No 2) [2010] FamCA 260
[2010] FamCA 260
12 April, 2010
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Edgar v Halle (No 2)*, Brown J of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia was required to determine the appropriate costs order following earlier proceedings between the mother and father concerning their child.
The central legal issue before the court was the quantum of costs to be awarded to the mother and the timeframe for their payment by the father.
Brown J ordered that the father pay the mother’s costs of and incidental to the proceedings. These costs were fixed at $10,856 and were to be paid by the father within three months of the date of the order.
The central legal issue before the court was the quantum of costs to be awarded to the mother and the timeframe for their payment by the father.
Brown J ordered that the father pay the mother’s costs of and incidental to the proceedings. These costs were fixed at $10,856 and were to be paid by the father within three months of the date of the order.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Edgar v Halle (No 2) [2010] FamCA 260
Most Recent Citation
Hawkins & Roe [2012] FamCAFC 77
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Felton and Penman
[2017] FCCA 26
Eades & Wrensted
[2014] FCWA 64
Wrensted & Eades
[2016] FamCAFC 46
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
2