Eastman v Besanko
Case
•
[2009] ACTCA 23
•22 October 2009
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Eastman v Besanko [2009] ACTCA 23
[2009] ACTCA 23
22 October 2009
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicant, David Harold Eastman, sought an extension of an order made by Higgins CJ on 7 October 2009. The respondent was Besanko. The matter came before the Federal Court of Australia.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether to grant an extension of the existing order. This required the Court to consider the circumstances and merits of the application for an extension.
The Court refused the application for an extension of the order. No specific reasoning beyond the refusal is provided in the supplied text.
The final order of the Court was that David Harold Eastman’s application for an extension of Higgins CJ’s order made on 7 October 2009 is refused.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether to grant an extension of the existing order. This required the Court to consider the circumstances and merits of the application for an extension.
The Court refused the application for an extension of the order. No specific reasoning beyond the refusal is provided in the supplied text.
The final order of the Court was that David Harold Eastman’s application for an extension of Higgins CJ’s order made on 7 October 2009 is refused.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Judicial Review
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Eastman v Besanko [2009] ACTCA 23
Most Recent Citation
Agriwealth Capital Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [2019] FCA 56
Cases Citing This Decision
10