Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Limited

Case [2013] FWC 5718


[2013] FWC 5718

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.318 - Application for an order relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees in agreements

Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Limited
(AG2013/8466)

Airline operations

COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE

SYDNEY, 16 AUGUST 2013

Application for Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees.

[1] This matter involves an application made under section 318 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The application has been made by Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Limited (Eastern) in respect of Evan Goodlet who is an employee of Qantas Ground Services Pty Limited (QGS).

[2] The application was lodged at Sydney on 9 August 2013. The application seeks an Order from the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) relating to Evan Goodlet who is an employee of QGS and a prospective employee of Eastern.

[3] The application contains grounds and submissions which, in relevant summary, contend that;

    ● Evan Goodlet is currently employed by QGS under the terms of the Qantas Ground Services Pty Limited Ground Handling Agreement 2009 (the Qantas Agreement);

    ● Evan Goodlet has been offered and he has accepted employment with Eastern;

    ● There is an association between QGS and Eastern and a transfer of business from QGS to Eastern in satisfaction of the meaning of transfer of business contained in Division 2 of Part 2-8 of the Act, will occur when Evan Goodlet commences employment with Eastern as is anticipated;

    ● The terms and conditions of employment for Evan Goodlet with Eastern are considered to be more beneficial for Evan Goodlet than the terms applicable under the Qantas Agreement; and

    ● In the absence of the Order sought by the application, the Qantas Agreement would be likely to cover Evan Goodlet as a transferring employee and bind Eastern as a new employer.

[4] The matter was listed for a Hearing in Chambers on 16 August 2013. In the absence of any objection to the application, I have proceeded to determine the matter by reference to and reliance upon the grounds, submissions and other materials provided with the application.

[5] The application seeks that the Commission make an Order under s.318 of the Act. Section 318 is in the following terms:

    “318 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees

    Orders that the FWC may make

      (1) The FWC may make the following orders:

        (a) an order that a transferable instrument that would, or would be likely to, cover the new employer and a transferring employee because of paragraph 313(1)(a) does not, or will not, cover the new employer and the transferring employee;

        (b) an order that an enterprise agreement or a named employer award that covers the new employer covers, or will cover, the transferring employee.

    Who may apply for an order

      (2) The FWC may make the order only on application by any of the following:

        (a) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer;

        (b) a transferring employee, or an employee who is likely to be a transferring employee;

        (c) if the application relates to an enterprise agreement—an employee organisation that is, or is likely to be, covered by the agreement;

        (d) if the application relates to a named employer award—an employee organisation that is entitled to represent the industrial interests of an employee referred to in paragraph (b).

    Matters that the FWC must take into account

      (3) In deciding whether to make the order, the FWC must take into account the following:

        (a) the views of:

        (i) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer; and

        (ii) the employees who would be affected by the order;

        (b) whether any employees would be disadvantaged by the order in relation to their terms and conditions of employment;

        (c) if the order relates to an enterprise agreement—the nominal expiry date of the agreement;

        (d) whether the transferable instrument would have a negative impact on the productivity of the new employer’s workplace;

        (e) whether the new employer would incur significant economic disadvantage as a result of the transferable instrument covering the new employer;

        (f) the degree of business synergy between the transferable instrument and any workplace instrument that already covers the new employer;

        (g) the public interest.

    Restriction on when order may come into operation

      (4) The order must not come into operation in relation to a particular transferring employee before the later of the following:

        (a) the time when the transferring employee becomes employed by the new employer;

        (b) the day on which the order is made.”

[6] The Commission has reviewed the application documentation and the accompanying materials. These documents outline the factual circumstances which have given rise to the application. Further, the submissions contained in the application address the relevant legislative requirements which are asserted to provide for proper basis for the making of the Orders sought.

[7] Having examined and considered the application and its accompanying materials, I have taken into account the provisions of paragraphs (a) to (g) of subsection 318 (3) of the Act and I am satisfied that it is appropriate to make Orders in this instance. Consequently, the application is granted and Orders [PR540298] broadly in accordance with the terms sought will be issued accordingly.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, AC327713  PR540229 >

Details
AGLC
Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Limited [2013] FWC 5718
Case
[2013] FWC 5718
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Limited was the subject of an application in the Fair Work Commission. The dispute involved the airline's acquisition of certain assets from another airline, along with the transfer of employees. The employees sought to have their existing enterprise agreements apply to the new employer, while the airline argued for the establishment of new agreements. The Fair Work Commission was tasked with determining the appropriate legal framework governing the employment terms of the transferring employees.

The central legal issues revolved around the application of the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly sections concerning the transfer of an enterprise. The court had to ascertain whether the transferred employees were entitled to have their existing agreements continue, or if the new employer could impose new terms. This involved interpreting the relevant sections of the Act and applying them to the specific circumstances of the case.

The Fair Work Commission, after considering the submissions from both parties and the relevant legal principles, ruled in favour of the employees. It was determined that the existing enterprise agreements should apply to the transferring employees, given the continuity of the enterprise and the workforce. The Commission found that the new employer could not impose new terms without the consent of the employees or through a process outlined in the Act. The decision underscored the importance of protecting employees' rights during corporate restructuring and mergers.

No further orders were made beyond the ruling on the application of the existing agreements.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.